REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
1864 MAGA 1864 MAGA 1864 MAGA 1864
- Thread starter sirfun
- Start date
So does this mean that they finally revealed the exact moment that America was great? I’ve been asking that question for over 8yrs now!
IVF shouldn't exist
If nature doesn't want your bodies to produce a child, you shouldn't be able to
Contraception is a good thing, abortion is just a simp test, but IVF is as abhorrent against nature as cloning and gene splicing
Says the dude who, no doubt, is guzzling protein-powder.... eating WAY more meat than he would have living out in "nature"... and probably even has an AG-1 subscription. Give it a rest, ifall.
Tough one.
Depends on how hardline you want to take that argument.
Although a C section usually comes from an abundance of caution on an already viable pregnancy. IVF is the whole cloth creation of a child by a couple that nature is trying to prevent from procreating for whatever reason
But I use the c section example to say why bulldogs shouldn't exist so there's that.
The only argument you're sticking to is.... how did you phrase it.... sometimes contradictions are required to make sense of complex issues.
I didn’t know if an emergency c section was also an abomination since nature was not allowing a person to be born
what about babies that are born very prematurely and only live due to modern technology
is that an abomination, given nature didn’t want this baby to live?
sorry if my question seems ridiculous or in no way similar to your stance on ivf
i don’t have the chance to ask these questions of anyone else who thinks this way since I didnt even know anyone thought this way until you mentioned it
Last edited:
Cancer treatment shouldn’t exist. If nature wants you to have cancer you should have cancer.