Any clips of this board in action?
I would be interested in one with the glass-ons designed for the board.
I would be interested in one with the glass-ons designed for the board.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Maybe like 5% trolling you 95% serious.You're trolling me, right?
Maybe like 5% trolling you 95% serious.
I know you had FCS 2 and I'm more interested in one with the glass ons the board was designed with.
And I'd love to see some vid clips of the board.
Interesting about the fin placement.Yeah, I've got 2. LOL. Can't bring myself to sell one cause I know I'll regret it. Both were 2nd hand and have FCS2. RK said he prefers the CyberSim- I think mainly for the rounded-nose aesthetic, but said GMM2 slightly more HP. He rides his CS with old Tom Carroll redlines, and he also likes old purple reactors in his planing hulls. Most of the @Hydrodynamica boards I've seen as glass-on thruster have a smaller center fin.
I use it as a step-down version of Evo in knee to waist-high. Mush-buster. Great for slopey-ier South SD reefs, fun up to shoulder-high. Effortless speed, surprising versatility. I've played around with fins a lot: skatey as quad/twin; solid as thruster/twin+trailer/quad+nub. Can really fling it around if you keep it short. Almost always a good time. Highly recommend for SoCal waves. I think JKB and I both feel as strongly about this underrated design as the vocal Fling supporters on here.
You're welcome to come try one if you're down in SD. Might help you nail down dims.
Stringered with full-length “Evo” channel. This was via @Havoc and notice the side fins are further fwd than the older one:
5’6 x 20 x 2.5, 33 CL
Stingerless with channel at tail. Definitely recommend SL construction for liveliness in small waves:
5'8 x 19 x 2.5, 32.9 CL
View attachment 91730
yeah, I like the more forward placement better- just suits my stance/surfing. So I ride that one... but I prefer the stringerless feel.Interesting about the fin placement.
I'll have to compare my new one to my old one. Fins on the old one were placed at 10" and 3".
After checking, both of mine are at 10" and 3". They're both magic so no reason to mess with it.yeah, I like the more forward placement better- just suits my stance/surfing. So I ride that one... but I prefer the stringerless feel.
I think Dan was commissioned by RK to shape a few boards for this "continual evolution of Simmons designs" project he seems to be working on. So RK owns them.Why didn't Firewire take this one as their own?
Yeah, dunno. Havoc said he didn't ask for any different placement, but maybe the Japanese guy who ordered the stringerless one did. I got it from Barsby, and I think it was an XTR stock board. It definitely likes being surfed from the tail more. I'll have to measure the fin boxes tomorrowAfter checking, both of mine are at 10" and 3". They're both magic so no reason to mess with it.
But I am curious as to why one of yours ended up with different fin placement.