REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
What would it take ? (Trump related)
- Thread starter cdes
- Start date
well looks like someone didBillyOcean said:
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/18/sen-lindsey-graham-russia-probe-looks-like-criminal-investigation.html
"It was a counterintelligence investigation before now. It appears to me now to be considered a criminal investigation," Sen. Lindsey Graham
that's not a deflection. Its a measure of your intellectual honesty and forthrightness.cdes said:
But to answer your question, yes I did vote for Hillary. I suppose that my vote was in many ways similar as a good portion of Trump supporters: I voted for her based on policy, not based on some love of her. I hate the term lesser of two evils (and the false equivalency that brings), but it is apt. Like I stated earlier, I think that there is an excellent argument to be made for smaller government, and I give most Trump voters enough credit to be able to say: "Yeah I wanted the smaller government candidate, but I dont approve of the president and if what credible news agencies are reporting is found to be true, then I think he's bad for this country".
I suppose that if a similar scandal had happened to Hillary then I would be forced to say the same.
I suppose that if a similar scandal had happened to Hillary then I would be forced to say the same.
You've seen Trump's cabinet, right? How can you make the above statements and still support Trump?ifallalot said:
No matter the party Goldman Sachs winsMany I spoke with said they had made a fundamental mistake of viewing Trump primarily as an ideologue with whom they disagreed rather than what he increasingly appears to be: an ill-prepared newcomer to the world stage, with uninformed views and a largely untested team that will now be sorely tried by a 9-day, 5-stop world tour that would be wildly ambitious even for a seasoned global leader.
“People are less worried than they were six weeks ago, less afraid,” a senior German government official with extensive experience in the United States told me. “Now they see the clownish nature.” Or, as another German said on the sidelines of a meeting here devoted to taking stock of 70 years of U.S.-German relations, “People here think Trump is a laughingstock.”
“The dominant reaction to Trump right now is mockery,” Jacob Heilbrunn, the editor of the conservative journal the National Interest, told the meeting at the German Foreign Office here while moderating a panel on Trump’s foreign policy that dealt heavily on the difficulty of divining an actual policy amid the spectacle. Heilbrunn, whose publication hosted Trump’s inaugural foreign policy speech in Washington during last year’s campaign, used the ‘L’ word too. “The Trump administration is becoming an international laughingstock.” Michael Werz, a German expert from the liberal U.S. think tank Center for American Progress, agreed, adding he was struck by “how rapidly the American brand is depreciating over the last 20 weeks.”
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/19/trump-middle-east-trip-saudi-arabia-215163
“People are less worried than they were six weeks ago, less afraid,” a senior German government official with extensive experience in the United States told me. “Now they see the clownish nature.” Or, as another German said on the sidelines of a meeting here devoted to taking stock of 70 years of U.S.-German relations, “People here think Trump is a laughingstock.”
“The dominant reaction to Trump right now is mockery,” Jacob Heilbrunn, the editor of the conservative journal the National Interest, told the meeting at the German Foreign Office here while moderating a panel on Trump’s foreign policy that dealt heavily on the difficulty of divining an actual policy amid the spectacle. Heilbrunn, whose publication hosted Trump’s inaugural foreign policy speech in Washington during last year’s campaign, used the ‘L’ word too. “The Trump administration is becoming an international laughingstock.” Michael Werz, a German expert from the liberal U.S. think tank Center for American Progress, agreed, adding he was struck by “how rapidly the American brand is depreciating over the last 20 weeks.”
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/19/trump-middle-east-trip-saudi-arabia-215163
“I just fired the head of the F.B.I. He was crazy, a real nut job,” Mr. Trump said, according to the document, which was read to The New York Times by an American official. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/us/politics/trump-russia-comey.html?rref=collection%2Fnewseventcollection%2FThe%20Trump%20White%20House
What. A. Retard.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/us/politics/trump-russia-comey.html?rref=collection%2Fnewseventcollection%2FThe%20Trump%20White%20House
What. A. Retard.
You are hereby banned from eating hamburgers and hotdogs.ifallalot said:OH MY GOD WHAT AM I GOING TO DO WITH MYSELF NOW THAT RANDOM GERMANS DON'T HAVE A HIGH OPINION OF OUR LEADERSHIPrice said:
THE HORROR!
They have a long time to go before they live this one down
You can still eat pizza with a fork and knife and enjoy the occasional rollmops though. :cookin: