trump and russia

[Saucy]

According to the eia we consume 7 billion, produce 3 and sell almost 2? So yes you are correct in that we export oil... kinda... not really..

 

[Autoprax]

That's weird.

 

[Mike_Jones]

.
CIA's claim that Russia hacked to hand Trump victory is REJECTED by Director of National Intelligence in blow to Democrats' attack on president-elect

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4027344/Top-U-S-spy-agency-not-embraced-CIA-assessment-Russia-hacking-sources.html

* The Office of the Director of National Intelligence oversees the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community - including the CIA and FBI
* Three ODNI sources have said the agency does not back the CIA assessment that Russia conducted hacks to help Donald Trump win the presidency
* Blow to CIA theory Democrats loved to tout comes on top of FBI not supporting the conclusion either
* Democrats are trying to delegitimize Trump's victory with claims he benefited from hacking by Putin
* Clinton's campaign chairman came back from the dead on Monday to bolster the claims.....

..

 

[StuAzole]

.
CIA's claim that Russia hacked to hand Trump victory is REJECTED by Director of National Intelligence in blow to Democrats' attack on president-elect

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4027344/Top-U-S-spy-agency-not-embraced-CIA-assessment-Russia-hacking-sources.html

* The Office of the Director of National Intelligence oversees the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community - including the CIA and FBI
* Three ODNI sources have said the agency does not back the CIA assessment that Russia conducted hacks to help Donald Trump win the presidency
* Blow to CIA theory Democrats loved to tout comes on top of FBI not supporting the conclusion either
* Democrats are trying to delegitimize Trump's victory with claims he benefited from hacking by Putin
* Clinton's campaign chairman came back from the dead on Monday to bolster the claims.....

..

Is it the Democrats' plan when basically every Republican is also backing an investigation?

And all your article says is that nobody can prove intent on the Russian side, seemingly admitting that the Russians did interfere. Here's the quote:

ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials. 'Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.'

 

[Mike_Jones]

.
CIA's claim that Russia hacked to hand Trump victory is REJECTED by Director of National Intelligence in blow to Democrats' attack on president-elect

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4027344/Top-U-S-spy-agency-not-embraced-CIA-assessment-Russia-hacking-sources.html

* The Office of the Director of National Intelligence oversees the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community - including the CIA and FBI
* Three ODNI sources have said the agency does not back the CIA assessment that Russia conducted hacks to help Donald Trump win the presidency
* Blow to CIA theory Democrats loved to tout comes on top of FBI not supporting the conclusion either
* Democrats are trying to delegitimize Trump's victory with claims he benefited from hacking by Putin
* Clinton's campaign chairman came back from the dead on Monday to bolster the claims.....

..

Is it the Democrats' plan when basically every Republican is also backing an investigation?

And all your article says is that nobody can prove intent on the Russian side, seemingly admitting that the Russians did interfere. Here's the quote:

ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials. 'Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.'

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.

.
Obama State Dept: $350K For Campaign Infrastructure Used Against Netanyahu In Israel Election

http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/state-dept-350k-group-built-campaign-structure-used-against-election-israels

According to the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), [Obasma's] State Department gave $349,276 in U.S. taxpayer-funded grants to a political group in Israel to build a campaign operation, which subsequently was used to try to influence Israelis to vote against conservative Benjamin Netanyahu in the March 2015 election for prime minister.

In the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report about the State Department's action, Chairman Bob Portman (R-Ohio) said, "It is completely unacceptable that U.S. taxpayer dollars were used to build a political campaign infrastructure that was deployed — immediately after the grant ended — against the leader [Netanyahu] of our closest ally in the Middle East. American resources should be used to help our allies in the region, not undermine them."

"The State Department ignored warning signs and funded a politically active group in a politically sensitive environment with inadequate safeguards," said Portman in a July 12, 2016 press release.....

But it's somehow wrong that a Russian official made contact with the future president of the United States.
..

 

[StuAzole]

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.


.. [/quote]

If I'm reading this right, you have no problem with Russia interfering with a US election and hacking our government's emails. Your issue is that it's being used by some to make Trump's victory seem tainted. Yes?

 

[Mike_Jones]

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.


..

If I'm reading this right, you have no problem with Russia interfering with a US election and hacking our government's emails. Your issue is that it's being used by some to make Trump's victory seem tainted. Yes?

Get it through your thick skull. None of your allegations are backed up with any evidence .......EVIDENCE.

Meanwhile the recent partial Michigan recount exposed that in 37% of Michigan precinct ballot counts disagreed with voter counts. The vast majority of these disrepancies happened in Dimocrat dominated precincts.

Vote fraud? You're damn straight there was vote fraud.
..

 

[$kully]

If only you showed a fraction of the outrage and concern for the mere possibility that a foreign state, russia in particular, hacked our democratic process that you showed for Benghazi and emails. Your phony outrage and lack of concern here is telling.

 

[Mike_Jones]

If only you showed a fraction of the outrage and concern for the mere possibility that a foreign state, russia in particular, hacked our democratic process that you showed for Benghazi and emails. Your phony outrage and lack of concern here is telling.

So in this one case the total lack of any EVIDENCE should not matter. Only the seriousness of the charges should count......

I was told that you are a murderer.
..

 

[Autoprax]

.
CIA's claim that Russia hacked to hand Trump victory is REJECTED by Director of National Intelligence in blow to Democrats' attack on president-elect

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4027344/Top-U-S-spy-agency-not-embraced-CIA-assessment-Russia-hacking-sources.html

* The Office of the Director of National Intelligence oversees the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community - including the CIA and FBI
* Three ODNI sources have said the agency does not back the CIA assessment that Russia conducted hacks to help Donald Trump win the presidency
* Blow to CIA theory Democrats loved to tout comes on top of FBI not supporting the conclusion either
* Democrats are trying to delegitimize Trump's victory with claims he benefited from hacking by Putin
* Clinton's campaign chairman came back from the dead on Monday to bolster the claims.....

..

Is it the Democrats' plan when basically every Republican is also backing an investigation?

And all your article says is that nobody can prove intent on the Russian side, seemingly admitting that the Russians did interfere. Here's the quote:

ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials. 'Of course they can't, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.'

Guilty with an explanation, your honor

 

[Autoprax]

If only you showed a fraction of the outrage and concern for the mere possibility that a foreign state, russia in particular, hacked our democratic process that you showed for Benghazi and emails. Your phony outrage and lack of concern here is telling.

Comrade Squigly is trying trying to earn brownie points with Putin.

Gluten free, please, Vlad.

 

[thrillkicker]

If only you showed a fraction of the outrage and concern for the mere possibility that a foreign state, russia in particular, hacked our democratic process that you showed for Benghazi and emails. Your phony outrage and lack of concern here is telling.

You tell him, pipsqueak! :cussing:

 

[StuAzole]

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.


..

If I'm reading this right, you have no problem with Russia interfering with a US election and hacking our government's emails. Your issue is that it's being used by some to make Trump's victory seem tainted. Yes?

Get it through your thick skull. None of your allegations are backed up with any evidence .......EVIDENCE.

Meanwhile the recent partial Michigan recount exposed that in 37% of Michigan precinct ballot counts disagreed with voter counts. The vast majority of these disrepancies happened in Dimocrat dominated precincts.

Vote fraud? You're damn straight there was vote fraud.
..

Which part of that article that you posted didn't you understand. They specifically said that they aren't saying the CIA is wrong about the hacking, just that they can't confirm the motivation. In case you missed it, here it is again:

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials."

And just so we're clear, you and Mr. Trump are in the minority here, even according to Trump-Friendly press: http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-leaders-join-call-for-probe-of-russian-hacking-of-u-s-election-1481589660

 

[Mike_Jones]

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.


..

If I'm reading this right, you have no problem with Russia interfering with a US election and hacking our government's emails. Your issue is that it's being used by some to make Trump's victory seem tainted. Yes?

Get it through your thick skull. None of your allegations are backed up with any evidence .......EVIDENCE.

Meanwhile the recent partial Michigan recount exposed that in 37% of Michigan precinct ballot counts disagreed with voter counts. The vast majority of these disrepancies happened in Dimocrat dominated precincts.

Vote fraud? You're damn straight there was vote fraud.
..

Which part of that article that you posted didn't you understand. They specifically said that they aren't saying the CIA is wrong about the hacking, just that they can't confirm the motivation. In case you missed it, here it is again:

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials."

And just so we're clear, you and Mr. Trump are in the minority here, even according to Trump-Friendly press: http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-leaders-join-call-for-probe-of-russian-hacking-of-u-s-election-1481589660

Yes, and the mainstream media all told us that Hillary was winning the election walking away. Now she's supposed to just walk away.

Either you have evidence (remember EVIDENCE?) or you don't have evidence. You don't have any evidence, but that doesn't stop you from getting pissy.

I've been told that you are a child molester.
..

 

[$kully]

Jump to 2:30

<div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"><div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:arc:video:comedycentral.com:6cd0a932-ec99-4751-bcc8-f6fc03a64035" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe></div></div>

 

[$kully]

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.


..

If I'm reading this right, you have no problem with Russia interfering with a US election and hacking our government's emails. Your issue is that it's being used by some to make Trump's victory seem tainted. Yes?

Get it through your thick skull. None of your allegations are backed up with any evidence .......EVIDENCE.

Meanwhile the recent partial Michigan recount exposed that in 37% of Michigan precinct ballot counts disagreed with voter counts. The vast majority of these disrepancies happened in Dimocrat dominated precincts.

Vote fraud? You're damn straight there was vote fraud.
..

Which part of that article that you posted didn't you understand. They specifically said that they aren't saying the CIA is wrong about the hacking, just that they can't confirm the motivation. In case you missed it, here it is again:

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials."

And just so we're clear, you and Mr. Trump are in the minority here, even according to Trump-Friendly press: http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-leaders-join-call-for-probe-of-russian-hacking-of-u-s-election-1481589660

This isn't about Hillary walking away or not. It's much bigger than that. This is about protecting whatever is left of the integrity of our democratic process for future elections. The only reason you're butthurt and angry right now is that acknowledging it might invalidate your boy.

Yes, and the mainstream media all told us that Hillary was winning the election walking away. Now she's supposed to just walk away.

Either you have evidence (remember EVIDENCE?) or you don't have evidence. You don't have any evidence, but that doesn't stop you from getting pissy.

I've been told that you are a child molester.
..

 

[StuAzole]

Let's say that you are correct. You're saying that nobody can prove that Russia didn't do it. Meh. Get back to us when you come up with one scintilla of evidence that they DID do it.


..

If I'm reading this right, you have no problem with Russia interfering with a US election and hacking our government's emails. Your issue is that it's being used by some to make Trump's victory seem tainted. Yes?

Get it through your thick skull. None of your allegations are backed up with any evidence .......EVIDENCE.

Meanwhile the recent partial Michigan recount exposed that in 37% of Michigan precinct ballot counts disagreed with voter counts. The vast majority of these disrepancies happened in Dimocrat dominated precincts.

Vote fraud? You're damn straight there was vote fraud.
..

Which part of that article that you posted didn't you understand. They specifically said that they aren't saying the CIA is wrong about the hacking, just that they can't confirm the motivation. In case you missed it, here it is again:

"ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can't prove intent,' said one of the three U.S. officials."

And just so we're clear, you and Mr. Trump are in the minority here, even according to Trump-Friendly press: http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-leaders-join-call-for-probe-of-russian-hacking-of-u-s-election-1481589660

Yes, and the mainstream media all told us that Hillary was winning the election walking away. Now she's supposed to just walk away.

Either you have evidence (remember EVIDENCE?) or you don't have evidence. You don't have any evidence, but that doesn't stop you from getting pissy.

I've been told that you are a child molester.
..

OK, champ, you win. The CIA is making up the idea that Russia was behind the email hacks and nobody else in the US security arena agrees (except all of them):

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/21/17-intelligence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/

 

[$kully]

Remember all the talk about how weak Obama was with his "apology tours" and bowing to Saudi Sheiks and all that? I gotta say I'm really looking forward to the criticism Trump gets from the right when he starts kissing up to the guy who hacked our elections.

 

[StuAzole]

Anyone have input on how Trump will improve ties with Russia while concurrently cracking down on Iran?

 

[Autoprax]

He'll make a deal like he did with Carrier.