Looks fun. Are the larger fins not parallel with the outer channels? Esplain? I'm just learning this stuff.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
GWS said:I don't know. If you check the properties it will lead you back to an open photobucket account. The logo looks like a take-off of one we did here poking fun at CI. I assume that's a glassing lam down at the tail, but when I zoom in I lose resolution. I can't read it. Eaton has been doing the Zinger for some time.
But all the ones I've seen have been funboards.
I would like to give it a try. Seems like with boxes in all positions you could sub in either of the Bonzer 5 fins. Which would you leave you screwed if you felt like you needed that Bonzer3 size lead fins, but like I said, that seems like a lot of fin.
stoked to see Roberts messing around w/ this and his team riders diggin themGWS said:I've never ridden them. Hate the way they look. IMHO, it just cheapens the look of the board. Which means jack-$hit if it surfs well, but whatever. Malcolm doesn't like them. For me that says it all. I don't argue with him on things Bonzer. Or Twinzer or Twonzer or ...
Yesssirrr!ghostshaper said:from the old thread I linked:
GWS said:I don't know. If you check the properties it will lead you back to an open photobucket account. The logo looks like a take-off of one we did here poking fun at CI. I assume that's a glassing lam down at the tail, but when I zoom in I lose resolution. I can't read it. Eaton has been doing the Zinger for some time.
But all the ones I've seen have been funboards.
I would like to give it a try. Seems like with boxes in all positions you could sub in either of the Bonzer 5 fins. Which would you leave you screwed if you felt like you needed that Bonzer3 size lead fins, but like I said, that seems like a lot of fin.stoked to see Roberts messing around w/ this and his team riders diggin themGWS said:I've never ridden them. Hate the way they look. IMHO, it just cheapens the look of the board. Which means jack-$hit if it surfs well, but whatever. Malcolm doesn't like them. For me that says it all. I don't argue with him on things Bonzer. Or Twinzer or Twonzer or ...
and thanks for sharing GWS :jam_on:
This is my favorite fin setup for fishes.Fredtool said:GDaddy. A small keel is a good idea. I was also thinking of a keel with a cutaway base. Maybe a little more cut then Normal.
Very interesting you brought this up and you’re spot on.GDaddy said:ACE was recommending low aspect fins for their bonzer and Zinger designs on those midlengths. I think in part because of the prevailing conditions at Sunset Cliffs where they were centered. He has previously commented about thinking that there's considerable overlay between channels and fins, enough so that he favored his 6-shooter (quad + canards) on flat bottoms over doing channels.
So now we've been seeing the NPjr twin single, and we know that the use of channels allows for the use of smaller fins and that channels add hold as well as adding drive, so this design has taken that track further by skipping altogether the twin single + channels combo that would have been an intermediary step between the two. The other thing is that Roberts has the main fins way further back when compared to the NPjr design, which engages them even more.