The house voted 419-3, Senate voted 98-2 on Russia sanctions. Why haven't they been enacted?

Billy Ocean

Duke status
Jan 7, 2017
19,330
2,636
113
Didn’t you already start this thread before?

There is no upside to escalating with Russia

Commander in Chief
 

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
60,526
17,500
113
BillyOcean said:
Didn’t you already start this thread before?

There is no upside to escalating with Russia

Commander in Chief
By not responding we're showing Russia that there's an upside to fvcking with our elections aren't we? :shrug:
 

sizzld1

Phil Edwards status
Mar 31, 2009
7,407
1,400
113
Don't forget Mexico and Canada. Haiti, vast swaths of Central America and Africa, etc., etc., etc. Strange how Russia seems to be the only country off limits.
 

StuAzole

Duke status
Jan 22, 2016
28,893
10,097
113
FecalFace said:
BillyOcean said:
Didn’t you already start this thread before?

There is no upside to escalating with Russia

Commander in Chief
What's the upside to "escalating" with Cuba?

North Korea?

:poke:
Don't forget Iran!
 

StuAzole

Duke status
Jan 22, 2016
28,893
10,097
113
BillyOcean said:
Didn’t you already start this thread before?

There is no upside to escalating with Russia

Commander in Chief
419 members of the House and 98 members of the Senate disagree.
 

hal9000

Duke status
Jan 30, 2016
56,790
17,072
113
Urbana, Illinois
BillyOcean said:
Didn’t you already start this thread before?

There is no upside to escalating with Russia

Commander in Chief

But I thought Trump was elected on the premise that he was going to get tough and make other countries respect us.
 

sizzld1

Phil Edwards status
Mar 31, 2009
7,407
1,400
113
Kento said:
ifallalot said:
Social media trolling isn’t “fucking with elections”
Well, you and BillyOcean got suckered. :beer:
Exactly. Basically every single intel agency disagrees with you iFall. Why do you think you are better informed as to the seriousness of Russia's actions than they are? Do you have more experience in this area? Is illegally hacking into voter rolls in order to better target possible "undecided" voters "fucking with the election"? Is illegally hacking into a political opponent's emails in order to use them offensively in an election "fucking with the election"? Come on man. :shameonyou:
 

StuAzole

Duke status
Jan 22, 2016
28,893
10,097
113
Doesn't really matter what "it" is - it doesn't get under iFall's skin unless it's done by a chick.
 

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
69,383
21,961
113
The Bar
StuAzole said:
Doesn't really matter what "it" is - it doesn't get under iFall's skin unless it's done by a chick.
Careful. You'll get ilked as a white knight if you take a stance that doesn't involve beating and raping women while chanting names of cereal brands. :beer:
 

studog

Duke status
Jan 15, 2003
35,858
637
113
CA
in larger context every national intelligence leader is saying Russia attacked our election process (hacking, bots, etc). even those department heads appointed by Cheeto are saying it. yet silence from the fat orange bastard on the topic cause he's afraid it will delegitimize his Presidency
 

manbearpig

Duke status
May 11, 2009
30,228
10,689
113
in the bathroom
stu dog said:
in larger context every national intelligence leader is saying Russia attacked our election process (hacking, bots, etc). even those department heads appointed by Cheeto are saying it. yet silence from the fat orange bastard on the topic cause he's afraid it will delegitimize his Presidency
Clearly everyone is wrong, because Trump says so.
 

Autoprax

Duke status
Jan 24, 2011
69,183
23,761
113
62
Vagina Point
Kento said:
StuAzole said:
Doesn't really matter what "it" is - it doesn't get under iFall's skin unless it's done by a chick.
Careful. You'll get ilked as a white knight if you take a stance that doesn't involve beating and raping women while chanting names of cereal brands. :beer:
I am against beating and raping (of anyone, not just women) unless, of course, they deserve it.