Stormy Daniels reportedly threatened after Trump was elected

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,746
23,362
113
GDaddy said:
Monica Lewinski was a direct subordinate at a federal jobsite. Not some chick off the street.


interesting legal breakdown of the NDA and why we'll all be able to enjoy
the Stormy Daniels interview with Anderson Cooper in the near future.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/a-legal-screw-up-by-michael-cohen-should-give-stormy-daniels-the-right-to-tell-her-story.html

Georgetown Law professor David Super told me that only Trump or an explicitly defined representative can sign off on such essential promises. If Trump’s signature is absent, it’s clear he didn’t sign off. And what about a representative? Trump’s attorney, Michael Cohen, set up a company called Essential Consultants LLC to agree to the deal with Clifford. But according to Super, an expert in contract law, there isn’t anything in the agreement to indicate Essential Consultants is authorized to agree to essential promises on Trump’s behalf.



What about the fact that Cohen is Trump’s lawyer? “Just because I’m your lawyer doesn’t mean I can give away your rights unless it says I’m authorized to do that,” Super told me. He further notes that there are portions of the agreement in which Essential Consultants LLC is explicitly granted specific abilities, such as the ability to accept “certain still images and/or text messages which were authored by or relate to DD.” This only bolsters Clifford’s case: If other specific abilities, like waiving the right to sue on Trump’s behalf, aren’t spelled out, that would seem to mean Essential Consultants LLC doesn’t possess them. (Super notes that the Latin term for this legal principle is expressio unius est exclusio alterius, meaning that the explicit mention of one thing is the exclusion of another.)

The strength of the case could explain Stormy’s public posture.

Furthermore, when Cohen signed the contract, he appears to have changed “Attorney for DD” to “Attorney for Essential Consultants, LLC.” Here, Cohen appears to be rejecting the notion that he is acting as DD’s attorney. Finally, and most simply, there is a separate line on the contract explicitly for Trump’s signature. Super believes it can thus be argued in court that it was “implied that the parties thought that his signature was needed [for the release of these claims].”
 

Gnudz

Phil Edwards status
Apr 5, 2011
7,137
5
38
Jonestown
www.stormsurfing.com
GromsDad said:
Gnudz said:
GromsDad said:
You sure Stormy isn't being pushed by the Russians as a means to destabilize the USA.
You sure Trump isn't?
Russia is the enemy of the United States and whoever had won the last election the Russians would be working to undermine and destabilize the country. Useful Idiots like you are part of the plan.
:roflmao:

 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,746
23,362
113
GromsDad said:
You guys just seem intent on personally destroying people. At this stage it has nothing to do with politics other than to destabilize the the country and personally president of the United States and his family. Its petty bullshit.
you'd think that an attack on the mechanisms of our democracy and the possible
compromise of the executive branch by a foreign entity would yield a different
response from a true patriot such as yourself.
 

hammies

Duke status
Apr 8, 2006
15,635
14,288
113
patrolman said:
Also, if any salacious photos were to be published do you think Melania will stick around?
It depends on what's in her contract.
 

Billy Ocean

Duke status
Jan 7, 2017
19,330
2,636
113
afoaf said:
GromsDad said:
You guys just seem intent on personally destroying people. At this stage it has nothing to do with politics other than to destabilize the the country and personally president of the United States and his family. Its petty bullshit.
you'd think that an attack on the mechanisms of our democracy and the possible
compromise of the executive branch by a foreign entity would yield a different
response from a true patriot such as yourself.
Pick yo conspiracy

Some us think the attack on democracy was from the inside, which is mo insidious
 

One-Off

Tom Curren status
Jul 28, 2005
14,265
10,464
113
33.8N - 118.4W
BillyOcean said:
afoaf said:
GromsDad said:
You guys just seem intent on personally destroying people. At this stage it has nothing to do with politics other than to destabilize the the country and personally president of the United States and his family. Its petty bullshit.
you'd think that an attack on the mechanisms of our democracy and the possible
compromise of the executive branch by a foreign entity would yield a different
response from a true patriot such as yourself.
Pick yo conspiracy

Some us think the attack on democracy was from the inside, which is mo insidious
You mean collushun amirite?
 

hal9000

Duke status
Jan 30, 2016
56,521
16,928
113
Urbana, Illinois
BillyOcean said:
afoaf said:
GromsDad said:
You guys just seem intent on personally destroying people. At this stage it has nothing to do with politics other than to destabilize the the country and personally president of the United States and his family. Its petty bullshit.
you'd think that an attack on the mechanisms of our democracy and the possible
compromise of the executive branch by a foreign entity would yield a different
response from a true patriot such as yourself.
Pick yo conspiracy

Some us think the attack on democracy was from the inside, which is mo insidious

let feelings and emotions guide you, not facts or evidence.