LeeD, I'll take that as a pass on the $100.
I have been thinking that it may be possible to improve the board I am describing (which is basically pictured by TFAD above) by contemplating a reduction of the swallow tail, or perhaps a slightly narrower tail for more bite in turns. The trouble is I suspect that the generous width in the tail (and throughout the board) is a key feature in the board's glide and speed in small, gutless waves.
I asked M. Campbell to make a bonzerfied version of this board ala 5'8", 21", 2.75" - we'll see what happens when it comes on down (fingers crossed).
I have been thinking that it may be possible to improve the board I am describing (which is basically pictured by TFAD above) by contemplating a reduction of the swallow tail, or perhaps a slightly narrower tail for more bite in turns. The trouble is I suspect that the generous width in the tail (and throughout the board) is a key feature in the board's glide and speed in small, gutless waves.
I asked M. Campbell to make a bonzerfied version of this board ala 5'8", 21", 2.75" - we'll see what happens when it comes on down (fingers crossed).