Should the Senate hear Bolton's testimony?

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,551
2,348
113
.
The stupidest part of the leftist demand for more witnesses is the accumulation of stories and witnesses piling up in graves. First leftists point at one witness and tell us he's going to show that Trump made a deal with Zelenszki. We hear from the witness only to find out that no, leftists lied. He has no first hand knowledge of any such thing. Now multiply that by 17 witnesses, and we find that leftists are doing nothing besides BORING THE LIVING SH!T out of people with nothing but lies.

Forget that, if Trump did everything he's accused of, it's completely within presidential authority, and contains nothing illegal. And forget that none of the charges of withholding funds are included in the impeachment articles.

Now we have Bolton, and ANOTHER leftist promise that THIS TIME Bolton has the goods on Trump. Why was Bolton not called in the Democrat House kangaroo court? He was being saved in order to arrive with a fanfare in the middle of the Republican Senate dismissing charges.Even though Bolton's book has not been released, the money quotes from the book allege that Bolton overheard Trump musing that he could make a deal with Zelenski. Bolton is one more dull witness who has no first hand knowledge.

How much of this crap must American voters be forced to suffer through before we get to conclude that the left's actions are what Trump is accused of, an attempt to subvert the 2020 presidential election?
.
 
Last edited:

Woke AF

Tom Curren status
Jul 29, 2009
11,519
7,881
113
Southern Tip, Norcal
I thought we were still trying to get over the 2016 election:cry:

Suffering is part of life, which also seems to be a focus of your existence. Don't worry squid this outrage will pass soon and another will arise to suffer through soon enough.

Be strong my little cephalopod.
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,639
23,253
113
How much of this crap must American voters be forced to suffer through...
are you really suffering? is this an inconvenience for you and your life?

seems like trials should have witnesses and that the accused should not
be able to prevent testimony or evidence from being reviewed
 
  • Like
Reactions: ~rwright~

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,551
2,348
113
are you really suffering? is this an inconvenience for you and your life?

seems like trials should have witnesses and that the accused should not
be able to prevent testimony or evidence from being reviewed
Any judge would have thrown these charges out of court before any trial started.
.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mundus

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,551
2,348
113
are you really suffering? is this an inconvenience for you and your life?

seems like trials should have witnesses and that the accused should not
be able to prevent testimony or evidence from being reviewed

In a real trial yes, both sides get to challenge evidence and testimony before it is presented to jurors. This trial has no admissible testimony or evidence. In the House the prosecutor got to present this evidence before Senators and the public. This is finally Trump's opportunity to rebut the allegations made in that testimony.
.
 

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
60,286
17,088
113
are you really suffering? is this an inconvenience for you and your life?

seems like trials should have witnesses and that the accused should not
be able to prevent testimony or evidence from being reviewed
Who do you think is suffering more? Squidley with impeachment or iFall with the horrors of reusable grocery bags?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Woke AF and mundus

studog

Duke status
Jan 15, 2003
35,863
637
113
CA
How much of this crap must American voters be forced to suffer through before we get to conclude that the left's actions are what Trump is accused of, an attempt to subvert the 2020 presidential election?
more until you realize Cheeto has broken the law
 

hal9000

Duke status
Jan 30, 2016
56,358
16,807
113
Urbana, Illinois
.
The stupidest part of the leftist demand for more witnesses is the accumulation of stories and witnesses piling up in graves. First leftists point at one witness and tell us he's going to show that Trump made a deal with Zelenszki. We hear from the witness only to find out that no, leftists lied. He has no first hand knowledge of any such thing. Now multiply that by 17 witnesses, and we find that leftists are doing nothing besides BORING THE LIVING SH!T out of people with nothing but lies.

Forget that, if Trump did everything he's accused of, it's completely within presidential authority, and contains nothing illegal. And forget that none of the charges of withholding funds are included in the impeachment articles.

Now we have Bolton, and ANOTHER leftist promise that THIS TIME Bolton has the goods on Trump. Why was Bolton not called in the Democrat House kangaroo court? He was being saved in order to arrive with a fanfare in the middle of the Republican Senate dismissing charges.Even though Bolton's book has not been released, the money quotes from the book allege that Bolton overheard Trump musing that he could make a deal with Zelenski. Bolton is one more dull witness who has no first hand knowledge.

How much of this crap must American voters be forced to suffer through before we get to conclude that the left's actions are what Trump is accused of, an attempt to subvert the 2020 presidential election?
.

Why don't you ask Bolton why he leaked the manuscript?

Why don't you ask why the NSC sat on this manuscript for several weeks and didn't let anyone else in the White House see it?
 

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,977
18,013
113
Why don't you ask Bolton why he leaked the manuscript?

Why don't you ask why the NSC sat on this manuscript for several weeks and didn't let anyone else in the White House see it?
Because Bolton is the swampiest of the swamp.

Trump didn't start enough wars or send enough troops overseas so he's being punished.
 

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
60,286
17,088
113
Because Bolton is the swampiest of the swamp.

Trump didn't start enough wars or send enough troops overseas so he's being punished.

Bolton is terrible. But that doesn't mean he can't offer credible insight into an administration that he was a part of. Keep in mind, Trump hired him. Only the best and brightest right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ~rwright~

GDaddy

Duke status
Jan 17, 2006
29,238
2,056
113
Carlsbad
I'd rather see all the witnesses, but I wouldn't mind it if the Senate remanded the case back to the House to complete the job they were supposed to do in the first place. I'd like to see the House assume 100% of the responsibility for the witnesses they're calling and whatever reactions ensue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ~rwright~

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,977
18,013
113
Bolton is terrible. But that doesn't mean he can't offer credible insight into an administration that he was a part of. Keep in mind, Trump hired him. Only the best and brightest right?
The enemy of my enemy is my friend?

There is nothing that can be credible from Bolton. He is the architect of neocon thought and it's a shame he is still relevant. Trump enabled his current relevancy so fuck him for that
 
  • Like
Reactions: GDaddy

mundus

Duke status
Feb 26, 2018
37,314
16,363
113
Because Bolton is the swampiest of the swamp.

Trump didn't start enough wars or send enough troops overseas so he's being punished.
Complaining about the swamp while shamelessly carrying water for most corrupt Administration ever? Hypocrisy is too mild of a word to describe this.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ifallalot

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,977
18,013
113
I'd be willing to ask you and your friends here the same question about the Trump admin.

Are you?
Bans on products so Marin County liberals can force their virtue signaling on the whole state are far more disruptive to our daily lives than El Drumpfo