You mean the intelligence peeps who spied on the D as a candidate?hal9000 said:
The ones who exonerated Hillary and crew
The ones who threatened trump when he came into office?
Those guys
Yeah, let’s trust them
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
****Official Unofficial Putin-Trump Summit Thread****
- Thread starter hal9000
- Start date
The ones who exonerated Hillary and crew
The ones who threatened trump when he came into office?
Those guys
Yeah, let’s trust them
damage is done already. Putin doesn't have to release anything. He's nearly accomplished everything. Cheeto's done all his bidding across Europe. Even Putin knows Congress isn't going to do anything against Cheeto.sirfun said:if you were Putin
would you threaten doofus potus
more with the release of pee tape
or smoking gun collusion evidence ?? )
doofus potus !! )stu dog said:damage is done already. Putin doesn't have to release anything. He's nearly accomplished everything. Cheeto's done all his bidding across Europe. Even Putin knows Congress isn't going to do anything against Cheeto.sirfun said:if you were Putin
would you threaten doofus potus
more with the release of pee tape
or smoking gun collusion evidence ?? )
Pride of America !! )
Um, maybe because the Russian troll farm activity on facebook leading up to the election is 100% factual and verified :confused2: I doubt that it was enough to sway enough votes, and Trump's campaign may have not been involved, but the activity by Russia is indisputable.BillyOcean said:
You seem to have trouble separating accusations of collusion with the facebook PR interference. Even if the the collusion is fake, that does not disqualify the Russian troll farms that made every attempt to sway public opinion in favor of Trump. The "fake news" reporter who had one of the last questions during the conference called Trump on that specifically, who then went into a Hillary rant because he knew the reporter was right.
Facebook influence on elections is huge.grapedrink said:
214 million users in the US
62 million voted for Trump in 2016
It doesn't matter at this point, it's all gravy for Putin now. He got almost everything he wanted and didn't have to burn one extra calorie to do it. Trump did all the heavy lifting for him.sirfun said:
I can't believe that Leftist rag, the Wall Street Journal, going after Trump like this.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-leaves-gop-intelligence-community-and-allies-in-the-hot-seat-1531772328
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-leaves-gop-intelligence-community-and-allies-in-the-hot-seat-1531772328
Putin to Trump:
"would you like to hold balls?"
"would you like to hold balls?"
I don't disagree that facebook is huge and influential, and that swing voters in key states are a crucial and vulnerable demographic. The problem is that it is almost impossible to quantify the overall impact of this type of PR campaign. How do you determine the number of voters who were on the fence, who regularly scrolled facebook and engaged in facebook political commentaries, who were then consciously or sub-consciously swayed to vote for Trump?FecalFace said:
Again- my broader point was not how much the troll farm facebook activity had an influence. It's the fact that it absolutely happened, and Trump refused to acknowledge it
To the Trump supporters: Do you actually think this was a strong showing for Trump today? You can't honestly say he didn't look weak and obsequious.
Facebook! Twitter!grapedrink said:Um, maybe because the Russian troll farm activity on facebook leading up to the election is 100% factual and verified :confused2: I doubt that it was enough to sway enough votes, and Trump's campaign may have not been involved, but the activity by Russia is indisputable.BillyOcean said:
You seem to have trouble separating accusations of collusion with the facebook PR interference. Even if the the collusion is fake, that does not disqualify the Russian troll farms that made every attempt to sway public opinion in favor of Trump. The "fake news" reporter who had one of the last questions during the conference called Trump on that specifically, who then went into a Hillary rant because he knew the reporter was right.
