John Brennan bad? Trump good?

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
42,338
2,105
113
The Californias
It's now apparently okay to wield presidential powers over somebody who disagrees with you.

While granting security clearance to your children and son in law who have financial and other interest in presidents business

America is becoming an Authoritarian Banana Republic and people love it.
 

GromsDad

Duke status
Jan 21, 2014
55,074
16,866
113
West of the Atlantic. East of the ICW.
His title is Former CIA Director.

There is no need for a former employee to have the keys to the building or a log on to the computer network. Same thing here. If another administration hires him they are welcome to give him access.

On a side note, I was in an office last month when the company figured out that an employee who had quit and gone to work for a competitor 6 months prior had left himself a back door into the computer network and was logging in at night and on the weekends and accessing customer, sales and marketing information. They had the police on hand and everything. I bet that sort of thing goes on a lot more often than people realize.
 

GDaddy

Duke status
Jan 17, 2006
29,238
2,056
113
Carlsbad
Trump has no business getting directly involved with security clearances. That's a BS move.

Bad Trump :shameonyou:
 

Surfdog

Duke status
Apr 22, 2001
21,817
2,032
113
South coast OR
Once Brennan (and Clapper) became a talking heads for CNN and MSNBC, security clearances needed to be cut. He and Clapper are likely sources of many leaks and innuendo that had no business being made public. Then giving their own personal commentary/opinion/speculation/spin to the MSM on what info they've garnered (feeding the Resistance). They're toxic being former Obama/Hillary loyalists, but allowed to spew in the media at the same time. I have a feeling down the road these guys will be facing a court for their actions.

This should've happen the day Trump was elected. Obama cleaned house when he was elected, Trump should've done the same, but probably didn't know better to do so. :shrug:
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,819
23,438
113
unsubstantiated accusations and baseless prognostication!

 

Autoprax

Duke status
Jan 24, 2011
68,891
23,506
113
62
Vagina Point
Surfdog said:
Once Brennan (and Clapper) became a talking heads for CNN and MSNBC, security clearances needed to be cut. He and Clapper are likely sources of many leaks and innuendo that had no business being made public. Then giving their own personal commentary/opinion/speculation/spin to the MSM on what info they've garnered (feeding the Resistance). They're toxic being former Obama/Hillary loyalists, but allowed to spew in the media at the same time. I have a feeling down the road these guys will be facing a court for their actions.

This should've happen the day Trump was elected. Obama cleaned house when he was elected, Trump should've done the same, but probably didn't know better to do so. :shrug:
What if trump is guilty?

You are assuming that he's a victim of the left trying to overthrow his presidency.

That could be true but it's unlikely.

You assumption would make more sense if his replacement wasn't gay lock down Race Bannon of Johnny Quest fame.
 

studog

Duke status
Jan 15, 2003
35,863
637
113
CA
time for Brennan to lay out all this sh!t he knows about Cheeto and the Russians
 

the janitor

Tom Curren status
Mar 28, 2003
12,340
1,737
113
north of the bridge
OK. This is straight out of The Apprentice playbook. So yes, douchy move by Trump.

BUT!

WTF Brennan? Dude has been behaving like a spoiled brat on twitter. He sank down to Trump's level and guess what, that is a losing bet.

So for me, this is like an antifa vs proud boys dustup, they deserve each other
 

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
60,382
17,242
113
Surfdog said:
Once Brennan (and Clapper) became a talking heads for CNN and MSNBC, security clearances needed to be cut. He and Clapper are likely sources of many leaks and innuendo that had no business being made public. Then giving their own personal commentary/opinion/speculation/spin to the MSM on what info they've garnered (feeding the Resistance). They're toxic being former Obama/Hillary loyalists, but allowed to spew in the media at the same time. I have a feeling down the road these guys will be facing a court for their actions.

This should've happen the day Trump was elected. Obama cleaned house when he was elected, Trump should've done the same, but probably didn't know better to do so. :shrug:
There’s a difference between replacing heads of the intel community and stripping away security clearances. Can you name anyone who Obama stripped of their clearance?
 

the janitor

Tom Curren status
Mar 28, 2003
12,340
1,737
113
north of the bridge
frvcvs said:
Surfdog said:
Once Brennan (and Clapper) became a talking heads for CNN and MSNBC, security clearances needed to be cut. He and Clapper are likely sources of many leaks and innuendo that had no business being made public. Then giving their own personal commentary/opinion/speculation/spin to the MSM on what info they've garnered (feeding the Resistance). They're toxic being former Obama/Hillary loyalists, but allowed to spew in the media at the same time. I have a feeling down the road these guys will be facing a court for their actions.

This should've happen the day Trump was elected. Obama cleaned house when he was elected, Trump should've done the same, but probably didn't know better to do so. :shrug:
There’s a difference between replacing heads of the intel community and stripping away security clearances. Can you name anyone who Obama stripped of their clearance?
ok, let's play

Can you name anyone from the Bush Administration with a security clearance or a Bush intel appointee who was constantly piliorying Obama on social media like Brennan has been?
 

casa_mugrienta

Duke status
Apr 13, 2008
43,833
18,402
113
Petak Island
Autoprax said:
casa_mugrienta said:
Apparently Autoprax never lived through the Clinton years.
WHATABOUT CLINTON!
About Clinton? :confused2:

About the Republicans and their endless investigations of all the Clintons' "criminal activities" culminating in a perjury charge obstruction of justice once they got the President under oath because they had nothing on him despite having stuff on his associates...
 

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
60,382
17,242
113
the janitor said:
frvcvs said:
Surfdog said:
Once Brennan (and Clapper) became a talking heads for CNN and MSNBC, security clearances needed to be cut. He and Clapper are likely sources of many leaks and innuendo that had no business being made public. Then giving their own personal commentary/opinion/speculation/spin to the MSM on what info they've garnered (feeding the Resistance). They're toxic being former Obama/Hillary loyalists, but allowed to spew in the media at the same time. I have a feeling down the road these guys will be facing a court for their actions.

This should've happen the day Trump was elected. Obama cleaned house when he was elected, Trump should've done the same, but probably didn't know better to do so. :shrug:
There’s a difference between replacing heads of the intel community and stripping away security clearances. Can you name anyone who Obama stripped of their clearance?
ok, let's play

Can you name anyone from the Bush Administration with a security clearance or a Bush intel appointee who was constantly piliorying Obama on social media like Brennan has been?
How about POTUS? He has a security clearance and he’s constantly pillorying his political opponents on Twitter. :pokestick:
 

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
42,338
2,105
113
The Californias
the janitor said:
frvcvs said:
Surfdog said:
Once Brennan (and Clapper) became a talking heads for CNN and MSNBC, security clearances needed to be cut. He and Clapper are likely sources of many leaks and innuendo that had no business being made public. Then giving their own personal commentary/opinion/speculation/spin to the MSM on what info they've garnered (feeding the Resistance). They're toxic being former Obama/Hillary loyalists, but allowed to spew in the media at the same time. I have a feeling down the road these guys will be facing a court for their actions.

This should've happen the day Trump was elected. Obama cleaned house when he was elected, Trump should've done the same, but probably didn't know better to do so. :shrug:
There’s a difference between replacing heads of the intel community and stripping away security clearances. Can you name anyone who Obama stripped of their clearance?
ok, let's play

Can you name anyone from the Bush Administration with a security clearance or a Bush intel appointee who was constantly piliorying Obama on social media like Brennan has been?
I'll play.

Can you name any president that has been as petty, vindictive, narcissistic and stupid towards citizens or this country, press as well as be openly mysygonistic, uncivil, xenophobic and racist?

Trump is "piliorying" private citizens on social media 10 times before breakfast and 48 times on the weekend.

This is the bed he made for himself and now that he's diarrheaed all over it, he's blaming everyone but himself.

And even more stupidly you do too.