REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
If the sun has a period of greater intensity, what do the science denying Climate Cultists propose we do to combat it?
- Thread starter GromsDad
- Start date
Ours are turning out really good. As good as store bought in terms of size and proportion. Better than what you’d find at a grocery store taste/freshness wise.
Nice big tender hearts.
Mrs. Duffy has legit farmers in her lineage. Also, we buried a cat right in that spot.
It’s just a method of transferring what ever tasty dipping stuff you have from the bowl to your mouth.
Would the role of the sun play a greater or a lesser roll than human activity. Simple yes or no. Thanks.According to scientific consensus, variations in solar activity play a minor role in climate variations. So there’s your answer.
What Is the Sun's Role in Climate Change? – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.climate.nasa.gov
read the article I posted, it’s written so even a person at your lexile level can understand it.
You're dodging and hiding from giving direct answers to direct questions. You are incapable of acting in good faith.
As it is currently understood, one day the sun will puff up to be a red giant and fry our lovely planet.
So long term, the sun will win.
On shorter terms, there have been coronal mass ejections that have blasted Earth with a few gigatons of solar "atmosphere", like the Carrington Event. Something close to this happened in 2012 and missed us by 8-10 days.
So shorter term, the sun will knock civilization for a loop.
At present, we can't do much about both of these things.
Regardless, I still like the concept of primum non nocere.
We can agree on that principal.
When everything about the environment gets spun based on a politicized economic bullshit theory about man warming the planet credibility is lost and nothing beneficial gets done. If you want to be effective on improving the environment you have to find common ground toward an agreeable goal. "Climate change" as we know it is 90% political and 10% complete horseshit. Trash, chemical waste, carcinogenic pollutants and other things like those are areas where real work can be done and where there can be consensus.
Not to mention the boy who cried wolf on every bullshit claim made about the climate in the past 50 years. Give it a rest on the climate. Its out of our control. Focus on what is real and tangible.
it amazes me how many people don’t understand the concept of “you don’t know what you don’t know”
You're just incapable of admitting that your belief in "Climate Change" is all based on a bunch of horseshit.
we should just discard any science with which we disagree, regardless of whether the same scientific methods are used to discover scientific facts with which we accept.