How far will Republicans go to ignore new evidence and contradict their previous stances?

Uberkuque

Gerry Lopez status
Nov 19, 2014
1,104
492
83
Thank you for answering hal's question as to why he relied on Rudy to investigate things and not the DOJ. Simply put in your own words, Trump can trust no one within the DOJ swamp. Thanks Lagunaboy.
Trump outsources national security issues to his personal lawyer whose obligation is to serve his interests. Jesus Christ, your unsophistication is bottomless. Go get your damned GED! (If you can.)
 

GDaddy

Duke status
Jan 17, 2006
29,238
2,056
113
Carlsbad
We've already established partisan political operations by specific known and identified individuals who were actively conspiring to remove Trump occurring within the FBI, the State Dept, the CIA, and even within the WH itself. That doesn't include other people whose roles may have been identified internally but whose activities haven't come to light publicly, but it doesn't include the element of the unknown - how many other bureaucrats are actively working to remove Trump BAMN?

Sooner or later bypassing those actors becomes an expression of common sense.
 

mundus

Duke status
Feb 26, 2018
37,311
16,359
113
We've already established partisan political operations by specific known and identified individuals who were actively conspiring to remove Trump occurring within the FBI, the State Dept, the CIA, and even within the WH itself. Sooner or later bypassing those actors becomes an expression of common sense.
Delusional excuses to protect a crook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woke AF

GDaddy

Duke status
Jan 17, 2006
29,238
2,056
113
Carlsbad
Delusional excuses to protect a crook.
Trump has been impeached and is currently being tried for it in the Senate. I've said many times on this forum that if things go badly for him then he gets what he gets.

But by the same token, those of his opposition who have acted unethically are also subject to the same - if they lose then they get what they get.