Feds Will Pay Entire Cost of Bridge Replacement?

r32

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 1, 2005
18,113
9,837
113
Cambria
"The Federal government will pay for the ENTIRE cost of reconstructing that bridge."

-Crippled Joe

Your tax dollars at work.

Britannia is one of 12 mutual insurers included in the International Group of P&I Clubs, which maintains more than $3 billion of reinsurance cover, sources familiar with the matter told Insurance Business.

Britannia itself is liable for the first $10 million in damages, both FT and Insurance Business reported. Whatever remains is dealt with by the wider mutual insurance group and Lloyd's of London, a reinsurance market in the UK, according to FT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,996
18,044
113
Clearly a federal responsibility.
Absolutely not

The ship's insurance should be paying for this, and if the insurance cannot then the government should sue Singapore for the funds

American taxpayers should be profiting on this, not paying for it

The only acceptable use of tax dollars would be to front the money to get the bridge rebuilt until funds could be properly compensated from the insurance and the flag country of the ship
 

sirfun

Duke status
Apr 26, 2008
17,887
7,079
113
U.S.A.
The only acceptable use of tax dollars would be to front the money to get the bridge rebuilt until funds could be properly compensated from the insurance and the flag country of the ship
trump should campaign on this platform !! )

only he knows some good lawyers that can make it happen !! )
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woke AF

Aruka

Tom Curren status
Feb 23, 2010
12,172
23,142
113
PNW
The ship's insurance should be paying for this, and if the insurance cannot then the government should sue Singapore for the funds
So if the roles were reversed and a privately owned US based ship took out a bridge in Singapore and the ships insurance didn't cover the total cost, the US taxpayer should be liable for the difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: plasticbertrand