REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
It is virtue signaling for sure. A sad concession to a lost battle. The allure of "free stuff" is simply too strongsizzld1 said:Virtue signaling. Meanwhile the people proposing it probably have a three martini a day habit and a pill cabinet that looks like CVS, with their kids struggling to kick an oxy addiction, and a quarter of their constituents on meth. Good times.StuAzole said:Has anyone answered the question "what is the policy trying to promote?"
Is it to punish poor people with addiction issues?
Is it to stop drug use?
Is it something else?
How is this subsidy different than the tax deduction subsidy?ifallalot said:It is virtue signaling for sure. A sad concession to a lost battle. The allure of "free stuff" is simply too strongsizzld1 said:Virtue signaling. Meanwhile the people proposing it probably have a three martini a day habit and a pill cabinet that looks like CVS, with their kids struggling to kick an oxy addiction, and a quarter of their constituents on meth. Good times.StuAzole said:Has anyone answered the question "what is the policy trying to promote?"
Is it to punish poor people with addiction issues?
Is it to stop drug use?
Is it something else?
Your liberal tears taste like that good french champagne with the orange label.Norm' said:It's all fine until the kids of the recipients are going hungry.
The widow ?Autoprax said:Your liberal tears taste like that good french champagne with the orange label.Norm' said:It's all fine until the kids of the recipients are going hungry.
Think of all the stadiums we could subsidize for billionaire sports team owners if it weren’t for those pesky food stampsStuAzole said:How is this subsidy different than the tax deduction subsidy?ifallalot said:It is virtue signaling for sure. A sad concession to a lost battle. The allure of "free stuff" is simply too strongsizzld1 said:Virtue signaling. Meanwhile the people proposing it probably have a three martini a day habit and a pill cabinet that looks like CVS, with their kids struggling to kick an oxy addiction, and a quarter of their constituents on meth. Good times.StuAzole said:Has anyone answered the question "what is the policy trying to promote?"
Is it to punish poor people with addiction issues?
Is it to stop drug use?
Is it something else?
If you cant afford to have kids then why have them?Norm' said:It's all fine until the kids of the recipients are going hungry.
It's also a progressive position that birth control should be available to everyone and that people who get pregnant who don't want kids can get abortions, but for some reason conservatives are against that.Wheelhouse said:If you cant afford to have kids then why have them?Norm' said:It's all fine until the kids of the recipients are going hungry.
Maybe birth control counseling should come standard with food stamps and welfare programs.
There's a progressive model of benefits paid thats why. more kids more money baby!
Why?JEwing said:Drugs or food. Not drugs and food.
Dumb people do badly with counter intuitiveness.StuAzole said:Why?JEwing said:Drugs or food. Not drugs and food.
And does that mean the policy is to end drug use?
Nobody has been able to tell me what this position is aiming to accomplish.
What if we went with "drugs or tax deductions" not "drugs and tax deductions"?
Yeah, what were those dumb kids thinking when they picked parents too poor to feed them :confused2:Wheelhouse said:If you cant afford to have kids then why have them?Norm' said:It's all fine until the kids of the recipients are going hungry.
no not at all. I feel sorry for the kids.grapedrink said:Yeah, what were those dumb kids thinking when they picked parents too poor to feed them :confused2:Wheelhouse said:If you cant afford to have kids then why have them?Norm' said:It's all fine until the kids of the recipients are going hungry.
Better to starve them as punishment
Reforming the welfare system is a band-aid on a broken leg. What needs to be addressed is why certain communities are so impoverished, and why its so difficult for for people to escape said poverty.no not at all. I feel sorry for the kids.
I just think the welfare cycle needs to be addressed
Kids are damn expensive
in AC theres always a guy (try roundabout Kentucky and Atlantic Av.'es) who will convertWheelhouse said:i was working at that store when they switched from the paper voucher food stamps to the card.
the major reason was because people were using the stamps as currency to buy other things... like crack