REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
She hasn't won the general though. Go back and read what I wrote. Turns out the democrat party is even more corrupt than I gave them credit for. Sorry Bernie.frvcvs said:We all know that Gromsdad thought that Hillary couldn't make it past the primary.
But a whole lotta people seemed to be concerned about men talking like men_Pico said:Im sorry that nobody cares about emails or Blow Jobs. I really am
LOL. So many thoughts... I do like the part where Trump's about to release his taxes and Obama's about to start a war with Russia.WSLshame said:Its all going to be over very soon for Hillary
We dont talk about assaulting a woman. Its one thing to say "she has a nice ass and I WOULD LIKE to fcuk her" and its another to say "I grab them by the pussy because I CAN BECAUSE IM A STAR." The former requires consent and the latter does not. So no...Dudes dont talk about assaulting anyone nor do we feel comfortable about ogling 10 year olds because they are going to be hot grown up and we are going to fcuk them.. So as usual you are full of sheet. Sorry.ifallalot said:But a whole lotta people seemed to be concerned about men talking like men_Pico said:Im sorry that nobody cares about emails or Blow Jobs. I really am
With Trump's actions corroborating his words, how long do you think it would take for his sh!t to get pushed in behind bars? He's a little too doughy to get the AB protection he would need._Pico said:We dont talk about assaulting a woman. Its one thing to say "she has a nice ass and I WOULD LIKE to fcuk her" and its another to say "I grab them by the pussy because I CAN BECAUSE IM A STAR." The former requires consent and the latter does not. So no...Dudes dont talk about assaulting anyone nor do we feel comfortable about ogling 10 year olds because they are going to be hot grown up and we are going to fcuk them.. So as usual you are full of sheet. Sorry.ifallalot said:But a whole lotta people seemed to be concerned about men talking like men_Pico said:Im sorry that nobody cares about emails or Blow Jobs. I really am
You may talk this kind of crap with your freaky deaky friends Ifall but you are in a lonely group shithead.
That's a woman speaking. She doesn't know_Pico said:This was not “just locker room banter,” she said, referring to Trump’s defense of the comments. “It was a powerful individual speaking freely and openly about sexually predatory behavior.”
In fact, she added, to “dismiss this as everyday locker room talk is an insult to decent men everywhere.”- FLOTUS
You're attributing his comments incorrectly. What he was saying is since he's a star, and since most women are whores (fact) that his money allows him to do any demeaning thing he wants and they LET him. There's no such thing a consensual assault unless you're talking about some really freaky deaky people_Pico said:We dont talk about assaulting a woman. Its one thing to say "she has a nice ass and I WOULD LIKE to fcuk her" and its another to say "I grab them by the pussy because I CAN BECAUSE IM A STAR." The former requires consent and the latter does not. So no...Dudes dont talk about assaulting anyone nor do we feel comfortable about ogling 10 year olds because they are going to be hot grown up and we are going to fcuk them.. So as usual you are full of sheet. Sorry.ifallalot said:But a whole lotta people seemed to be concerned about men talking like men_Pico said:Im sorry that nobody cares about emails or Blow Jobs. I really am
You may talk this kind of crap with your freaky deaky friends Ifall but you are in a lonely group shithead.
So Kobe was innocent after all!ifallalot said:You're attributing his comments incorrectly. What he was saying is since he's a star, and since most women are whores (fact) that his money allows him to do any demeaning thing he wants and they LET him. There's no such thing a consensual assault unless you're talking about some really freaky deaky people_Pico said:We dont talk about assaulting a woman. Its one thing to say "she has a nice ass and I WOULD LIKE to fcuk her" and its another to say "I grab them by the pussy because I CAN BECAUSE IM A STAR." The former requires consent and the latter does not. So no...Dudes dont talk about assaulting anyone nor do we feel comfortable about ogling 10 year olds because they are going to be hot grown up and we are going to fcuk them.. So as usual you are full of sheet. Sorry.ifallalot said:But a whole lotta people seemed to be concerned about men talking like men_Pico said:Im sorry that nobody cares about emails or Blow Jobs. I really am
You may talk this kind of crap with your freaky deaky friends Ifall but you are in a lonely group shithead.
And honestly I wouldn't go around talking about a lonely group if you think this kind of talk is offensive. See GWS's post about chemical castration in the other thread
RasmussenGWS said:I figured snowball's chance in hell but...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_oct13
GWS said:"Dude, I don't even know who "Nate" at 538 is.
I believe Rasmussen called it dead on last time. I'll stick with Gallup and Rasmussen. They've been at this awhile."
http://forum.surfermag.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showthreaded&Number=1986293
And here we are again. Some people never learn do they?GWS said:"Whatever. I just looked him up. The lone statistician. I see a few problems with that. I think I'll stick with the pros that have been at this for awhile. Time will tell."
http://forum.surfermag.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showthreaded&Number=1986296
No I called Obama the winner. However I thought it would be closer. That was your big win on that one. I called it right, but got the amplitude wrong.frvcvs said:RasmussenGWS said:I figured snowball's chance in hell but...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_oct13
Didn't you make the same mistake in 2012 by listening to them re:Romney. I'm too lazy to search.
So yes, I called the election correctly but missed the amplitude of the win."But whatever, There’s really not much point in arguing any of this with the election just days away.
If I was betting on this mess, I’d go for Obama to squeak a win"-GWS