My experience as a high school teacher is this: The top quartile of students are getting an education that is miles better and more rigorous than what similar students got 30 - 40 years ago. They are doing robotics and computer science and medical biology and graphic design and all kinds of things that just didn't exist then. Plus they're loading up on AP and dual enrollment classes and the instructors are doing a good job and most of the kids are working hard and learning. I look back on what we did and what was expected of college track kids in the '70s and think OMG, our educations sucked compared to what these kids get!
Not at the 2 high schools that I taught at for 12 years.
Much more rigorous than my high school I attended.
I don't think these kids are smarter than my cohort is, but they work way harder. I was/am a lazy piece of shvt though.
I can only speak from my experience at 3 different unis over the past 20 years.
Many of my fellow scholars always seemed woefully undereducated/unprepared for college in terms of knowledge.
A lot of college professors are now saying the same thing - the kids are not prepared for college level coursework and need remediation.
I think perhaps the erBB lends itself to a small subset of the population - upper middle/upper class people and their kids from geographic areas or genes oriented towards the sciences or slightly higher than average IQ (believe it or not!
).
At the same time my niece is one of those high-achieving 24/7 studiers but when I see some of the stuff she's working on it seems horribly average... I'm like "Why is this causing you to work so hard?"