REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Many times I've read on here that a single concave does as much as theseDamn. That’s insane.
I got out of the water when I noticed the tweaked nose and switched to a 6.6 round tail Channel Island Fred Rubble. I could immediately feel it pushing water and it did not paddle or engage as well as the 6.2. Felt like the entry was over rockered. Works good in the pocket, but does so at an expense of paddle power and drive. I like the board, and think the outline is perfect, but it did not feel like it lifted as quickly on the take-off and the waves were really good. After riding boards with flat bottoms, edged rails, and glass fins I don't think I can go back to what feels to me dull suction cup concave, soft rail, and plastic fin standard issue. I am amazed more shapers aren't making them like this.
Not to be hating (but I am). I think the guy is wrong. He attributes the change in performance to some board characteristics to sound smart, when it's the less volume of the CI that's working against him. The Griffin is 32-34 (guesstimate) and the CI is 30 (from CI website).I got out of the water when I noticed the tweaked nose and switched to a 6.6 round tail Channel Island Fred Rubble. I could immediately feel it pushing water and it did not paddle or engage as well as the 6.2. Felt like the entry was over rockered. Works good in the pocket, but does so at an expense of paddle power and drive. I like the board, and think the outline is perfect, but it did not feel like it lifted as quickly on the take-off and the waves were really good. After riding boards with flat bottoms, edged rails, and glass fins I don't think I can go back to what feels to me dull suction cup concave, soft rail, and plastic fin standard issue. I am amazed more shapers aren't making them like this.
Kevin is watchingNot to be hating (but I am). I think the guy is wrong. He attributes the change in performance to some board characteristics to sound smart, when it's the less volume of the CI that's working against him. The Griffin is 32-34 (guesstimate) and the CI is 30 (from CI website).