Clownworld Attempted Coup Report

[sussle]

here‘s what I don’t get……why do people listen to him? They all know it’s not going to turn out well for them, so why do they go along with Trumby?

Stockholm Syndrome

 

[kidfury]

These guys argue and argue and then vote Democrat anyway. With a couple exceptions
if they vote at all

 

[Ifallalot]

...in which Clownworld does everything possible to overturn a legit election.



here's the report: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Interim Staff Report FINAL.pdf

if you don't like it but don't read it, then stfu. someone should go to jail.

Senate Judiciary Committee issues sweeping report detailing how Trump and a top DOJ lawyer attempted to overturn 2020 election

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday released a sweeping report about how former President Donald Trump and a top lawyer in the Justice Department attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

www.cnn.com

SOMEONE SHOULD DO SOMETHING

LMAO Senate Judiciary Committee

 

[manbearpig]

SOMEONE SHOULD DO SOMETHING

LMAO Senate Judiciary Committee

SHILLLLLLLLLLLLLL

 

[GromsDad]

...in which Clownworld does everything possible to overturn a legit election.

Durham issues fresh round of subpoenas in his continuing probe of FBI investigation into Trump, Russia

Special Counsel John Durham has issued a new set of subpoenas, including to a law firm with close ties to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign, an indication that Durham could be trying to build a broader criminal case, according to people briefed on the matter. So far, Durham's two-year probe into...

www.cnn.com

 

[hal9000]

Durham issues fresh round of subpoenas in his continuing probe of FBI investigation into Trump, Russia

Special Counsel John Durham has issued a new set of subpoenas, including to a law firm with close ties to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign, an indication that Durham could be trying to build a broader criminal case, according to people briefed on the matter. So far, Durham's two-year probe into...

www.cnn.com

durham is coming

 

[GromsDad]

Yep

‘Collusion’ pushers in a spin over Durham indictment linked to Clinton camp

http://nypost.com/2021/10/01/collusion-pushers-in-a-spin-over-durham-indictment-linked-to-clinton-camp/

 

[hal9000]

LOCKER UP!!!!

 

[Phi1]

Switch the parties (10 pubs on a committee issuing a ”report” on Dem ex-prez) and I’d say the same thing.

It‘s amazing how gullible people are.

But your a good boy so eat every last crumb of sh!t they serve to you.

Eat up and maybe you can have a cookie.

They obtained records, emails, and interviews directly from people working under Trump. They’re using their own words to prove their actions.
Yes it’s possible to use things out of context and purposefully omit exculpatory evidence, but how many times have we seen proof and testimony of the exact same type of behavior? How many people have said “Yeah, I voted for him because he’s an asshole!” How many times did Trump admit out loud and in recorded conversations to “find more votes”?

Suddenly the “butter emmaylzz!!!” crowd doesn’t care about emails. Talk about gullible.

On January 23, 2021, the Committee asked DOJ to produce documents related to these efforts. DOJ cooperated with the Committee’s request, producing several hundred pages of calendars, emails, and other documents in the ensuing months.

On May 20, 2021, following DOJ’s production of emails from former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to Rosen asking DOJ to investigate several debunked election fraud claims, the Committee asked the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for additional Trump White House records ... NARA has not responded to date, and has represented to the Committee that the delay in transitioning electronic Trump records from the White House to NARA may prevent the Committee from obtaining a response for several more months.

In addition to obtaining and reviewing documents, the Committee interviewed key former DOJ personnel, including Rosen, former Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, and former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia Byung Jin (“BJay”) Pak. DOJ and the White House authorized these witnesses to testify about their internal communications without restriction, citing the Committee’s “compelling legislative interests ... in understanding these extraordinary events: namely, the question whether former President Trump sought to cause the Department to use its law enforcement and litigation authorities to
advance his personal political interests with respect to the results of the 2020 presidential election.”


The Committee also requested to interview Clark, whom DOJ authorized to testify on the same terms as the other former DOJ officials. DOJ authorized Clark’s appearance on July 26, 2021. More than two months after DOJ authorized him to testify without restriction, Clark still has not agreed to the Committee’s request that he sit for a voluntary interview.

 

[Duffy LaCoronilla]

They obtained records, emails, and interviews directly from people working under Trump. They’re using their own words to prove their actions.
Yes it’s possible to use things out of context and purposefully omit exculpatory evidence, but how many times have we seen proof and testimony of the exact same type of behavior? How many people have said “Yeah, I voted for him because he’s an asshole!” How many times did Trump admit out loud and in recorded conversations to “find more votes”?

Suddenly the “butter emmaylzz!!!” crowd doesn’t care about emails. Talk about gullible.

You must be mistaking me for someone else. I’ve never been a butteremalze guy.

That’s the whole point of my post.

This is all theater.

Enjoy your cookie.

 

[manbearpig]

You must be mistaking me for someone else. I’ve never been a butteremalze guy.

That’s the whole point of my post.

This is all theater.

Enjoy your cookie.

Shill baby shill.

 

[One-Off]

here‘s what I don’t get……why do people listen to him? They all know it’s not going to turn out well for them, so why do they go along with Trumby?

Cuz they're afraid he'll call them names. And then the redhats will call them names. Next thing yo know a mob is looking to hang them.

 

[Duffy LaCoronilla]

Shill baby shill.

Shill for what? Be specific.

 

[Autoprax]

Switch the parties (10 pubs on a committee issuing a ”report” on Dem ex-prez) and I’d say the same thing.

It‘s amazing how gullible people are.

But your a good boy so eat every last crumb of sh!t they serve to you.

Eat up and maybe you can have a cookie.

The flaw in your reasoning is Trump's unusual venality even for a politician..

Couple that with the crimes trump commits in plain sight and you conclusion seems dubious.

 

[Duffy LaCoronilla]

The flaw in your reasoning is Trump's unusual venality even for a politician..

Couple that with the crimes trump commits in plain sight and you conclusion seems dubious.

#buttrump!

 

[Phi1]

You must be mistaking me for someone else. I’ve never been a butteremalze guy.

That’s the whole point of my post.

This is all theater.

Enjoy your cookie.

Yes, sorry to ilk you with the butter crowd.

This is likely all theater because Dems have an extremely slim margin of power and aren’t enforcing or acting on subpoenaes or acting like they have the majority.

It’s like they’re milking this for voter engagement and donations while thinking there’s no threat to their very thin majority that includes how many septuagenarians members? Dems are setting up to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

 

[manbearpig]

Shill for what? Be specific.

The fact you don’t know what I’m talking about says a lot.

I’m not surprised.

 

[all3]

So 10 democrats issued a report critical of Trump?

Shocking news.

With actual evidence, not just hot air. Testimony, emails texts.

 

[Autoprax]

#buttrump!

I like that you have a cognitive system that allows you to think anything you want.

FREEDUMB!

 

[Duffy LaCoronilla]

I like that you have a cognitive system that allows you to think anything you want.

FREEDUMB!

As opposed to thinking only what I’m told to think….