A government may regulate the manner of that carry only if it demonstrates that the regulation is identical or closely analogous to a firearm regulation broadly in effect when the Second or Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. Id. at 2129–30, 2133.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
California Open Carry?
- Thread starter VonMeister
- Start date
A government may regulate the manner of that carry only if it demonstrates that the regulation is identical or closely analogous to a firearm regulation broadly in effect when the Second or Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. Id. at 2129–30, 2133.
The Volunteer Moms Poring Over Archives to Prove Clarence Thomas Wrong
What they’ve found directly contradicts the Supreme Court’s conclusions.
Replying to a district court decision on open carry with a story about a group of Karens mad at a Supreme Court decision on concealed carry….The Volunteer Moms Poring Over Archives to Prove Clarence Thomas Wrong
What they’ve found directly contradicts the Supreme Court’s conclusions.slate.com
Maybe the Volunteer Mommy’s should’ve been following what the 9th Circuit was up to.The Volunteer Moms Poring Over Archives to Prove Clarence Thomas Wrong
What they’ve found directly contradicts the Supreme Court’s conclusions.
holy fkn DUFFMANReplying to a district court decision on open carry with a story about a group of Karens mad at a Supreme Court decision on concealed carry….
says the guy that posted links to 10 videos that were, at best, orthogonal to the inane point he was trying to make in other threads
if you bothered to read either the article or the decision, you would see that the common thread is the notion of tying contemporary gun legislation to that which was historically in place in the 1800's and, to wit, includes examples of open carry having been limited in the relevant timeframe quoted in OP's post
please try to keep up
The Constitution means what it says it means. We are supposed to all equally fall under the rule of laws, not unequally under the jackboots of tyrants.
Would be great if i could keep wearing my burning man hat once i'm back in CA
Last time we let a bunch of do-gooder moms control policy we got ProhibitionThe Volunteer Moms Poring Over Archives to Prove Clarence Thomas Wrong
What they’ve found directly contradicts the Supreme Court’s conclusions.
I waffled on that...they aren't overtly pointing the thing at you, they are just letting you know it's there
Yeah, I get that.
It's definately not signaling safety.
From what I have learned about the nervous system, we all need to be actively signaling safety to have a functioning society.
I think psychologically, people who feel the need to open carry have abnormally high amounts of fear and insecurity. Not the kind of people I prefer to be around.
Fortunately, it's extremely rare to see anyone open carry, at least in these parts.
It’s inappropriate in most cases in the US. In rural areas where there’s a very real possibility of being attacked by wildlife it‘s not a problem but open carry at Whole Foods in santa Mónica is asshole.
I do however believe that people should ultimately have the right to do it.