REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Antonio Brown
- Thread starter ...
- Start date
So you are ok with Michael Jackson molesting little white boys because he's the King of Pop?
Colin Kaepernick (after 2 years on the shelf) is about as good as the bottom two or three "mobile" QB and basically everyone wants those people off their team because they suck. Either they can't get rid of them or it's not worth cutting someone and bringing in someone who is just as bad AND doesn't get the system.
0 dropback passing teams have any use for Kaepernick. If he was the fastest man alive with the strongest arm alive he'd be worthless to 20-25 NFL teams because he's a square peg and they have round holes.
The very few teams with fanbases that would partially tolerate Kaepernick (SF Bay, LA, Baltimore, Philly) already booted him (49ers) or have their own QB drama.
Being a drama queen who used a slur (with no video) is far less of a negative with the snowflake subset of the NFL fan base than clear-eyed advocacy for Black Lives Matter.
Maybe he'll call Brady or Kraft a Trump-loving cracker on camera and then we'll get somewhere.
If I was the Bucs, Jags, Bears, Saints or Bengals - I'd pick him up. From a team standpoint.
From a fanbase stand point, I only think Ravens, 49ers, Raiders, Seahawks and maybe Saints could get away with signing him.
I would have agreed with this two years ago, but Jameis Winston and Foles are both better at throwing than Kaepernick. Bears have no room with the Trubisky move.
Kaepernick is a 32 year old "mobile" QB which means he'd last 3-4 weeks, tops, before he was out for the season with an injury.
Bungles, I can maybe see.
Saints? Brees and Bridgewater? Bridgewater is 5 years younger and made a Pro Bowl as a rookie, and Brees is an all-time great.
Don't worry we just signed the steelers backup QB Dobbs (the old VOLS QB) to Back up our other Backup.
Jags are all set for the season....ha!
Who's the best QB coming out of college this season?....asking for a friend.
I'm not saying Kaep starts, I'm saying sign him as a back up. He still has value.
Foles out till week 11. Winston still looks crappy. Brees can't play forever. Who's going to back up Bridgewater?
I'd say Kaep is better than a lot of back ups. His legs give your team another dimension. You can win with him if your starter goes down. Can't say that about most back ups.
I'd bet if you asked Bears defense discretely, they'd rather have Kaep tucking it and running than Trubinsky throwing rainbows.
I've had that injury, if it's his throwing arm, he's not back this season at all.
Why would you put him in at week 11 anyway?, we will most likely be out of the playoffs with a backup QB backing up another backup QB. Both basically rookies.
Foles looked good for all 10 plays I got to see him Sunday. This season may be more painful than the last 24.