why won't you just say what you think succinctly and out loud?I'm not sure how you are defining it.
When they say over and over that "demographics are destiny" do you think they mean a changing electorate will lean more blue?
If illegal immigrants were generally thought to be highly conservative republicans - how fast would the border be closed??
you're implying that democrats are allowing immigrants in so that they can vote blue
there are multiple logical flaws here:
1. illegal immigrants cannot vote in elections. they audit every election and there is no material voter fraud (for either party) perpetrated by illegal immigrants.
2. legal immigrants do tend to vote Democrat as shown by the data, but there is no corresponding legislative push by Democrats to increase legal immigration. there seems to be an inference that because they were let in by Democrats that they are favoring Democrats, but that's not evidenced by legislation or rhetoric. It also ignores the fact that most people who are able to legally immigrate from other countries tend to be affluent and educated which are two key predictors for Democratic party affiliation for native born Americans.
this whole argument is a fkn red herring
the "great replacement theory" is logically flawed and serves only as more fear mongering for the mindless aggrieved do nothing who blames their lot on everyone but their own failures
once again, the scientist demonstrates his wanton idiocy by reposting a baseless screen grab
this is precisely the type of mediocrity-cum-victimhood that plagues the american right, which is ironic considering how much time they spend simultaneously trying to convince everyone how sigma they are
beta clucks