REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Wasn't Christensen doing this years ago?He seems like an insightful guy.
I remember Ian Walsh surfing a Christenson with an exaggerated version. That one looked heavy and sketchy. Pretty sure it only lasted one session.Wasn't Christensen doing this years ago?
edit: they allude to other shapers doing this prior.
nah. aerospace technology broI recall seeing this earlier and somewhat laughing that it's a copy of the CT bullet nose we put on Bark paddleboards. It's not from SUP tech, it's from paddleboard tech that was then stolen by SUP'ers.
The key nowadays is to call everything "technology," e.g. "advanced sanitation comfort technology" (quilted toilet paper).nah. aerospace technology bro
I think the nose on a traditional gun provides lift through the front rocker entry just like it does on your thruster (imagine an upside-down airplane wing). Unfortunately, the lift works on both water and air and the aerodynamic lift keeps you from making the drop. I think the new nose has less lift and he's compensating for the loss of hydrodynamic lift with buoyancy.my gut feeling is that floatation has less relevance at higher speeds....