A decent assessment that the tax cuts the Republicans have championed for 40+ years blow goats. I concur.Because our economy is so based on consumer spending, a lot depends on whose taxes you cut and whose you raise.
If you cut taxes for the middle and lower class - people who spend everything they make on food, shelter. clothing, transportation, and so on, any additional money they get goes right back into the economy, because they spend it all.
Rich people don't spend all their money though, so cutting taxes on them doesn't feed the economy in the same way. They "invest". Maybe they'll buy another 1000 shares of AAPL, but they are not really investing in the company, since the only money AAPL ever got from those 1000 shares was at the IPO. They're really only investing in the person who sold them the 1000 shares.
The opposite is true when you raise taxes - it cuts straight into how much money poor and middle class can spend, so the economy takes a hit. But rich people have no trouble paying their taxes and it doesn't hurt them at all.
But personally, I see some good in Rick Scott's plan to raise taxes on the lower class. IMHO it's going to involve making EVERYONE feel some pain before we have an honest conversation about cutting spending. The GOP threatens any federal subsidizing of school lunches for poor kids every chance they get. Basically nothing. The Democrats shave off a tiny bit of future growth and while it is a cut relative to baseline, it's not balancing the budget, because it's basically nothing.
The budget isn't like 5-10% out of whack. It's like 25-33% out of whack. A big chunk. I don't think we can get there solely soaking the rich and IMHO that approach won't yield an honest assessment of where we need to cut spending.