Suspected Chinese spy balloon found over northern U.S.

hal9000

Duke status
Jan 30, 2016
56,525
16,927
113
Urbana, Illinois
.
Biden admin offers to brief Trump officials on past Chinese spy balloon incursions

Answer: Hell no. These Biden lapdogs did not make the claim that Trump officials watched while Chinese spy balloons floated across the Unites States simply to Trump officials. Neither did they announce that Trump officials weren't aware of it at the time simply to Trump officials. These idiots announced these things to the PUBLIC in an attempt to deflect the fact that Biden purposefully allowed a Chinese spy balloon to traverse the United States.

These Biden thugs owe any explanations to the same public that they tried to con with their previous lies.
.
IC pulled receipts on Team Chump.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ifallalot

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,596
2,358
113
IC pulled receipts on Team Chump.

Bullshit. What receipts? Show them.

If the evidence is classified then it can't be referred to in the first place. If it's just what it looks like, a convenient lie, then no, there's nothing to show period.
.
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,596
2,358
113
I swear to god...what the actual fk is wrong with this psychobigot?

unfknsane

These Biden goons didn’t use a private “briefing” to accuse Trump of allowing a Chinese spy balloon to traverse the United States during his watch. They used a televised public appearance.

The claim was a lie intended to deflect criticism for Biden provably doing what they are accusing Trump of doing.

The private briefing aspect of this latest story is the Biden regime admitting that they can’t be trusted with classified information. Even if the proof had existed and was this classified then the Biden regime should never have mentioned it in the first place.
.
 

hal9000

Duke status
Jan 30, 2016
56,525
16,927
113
Urbana, Illinois
You and Biden are saying that Biden and his goons can't be trusted with classified information. The Biden regime seems to have a long history confirming this concept.
.
biden could declassify the info. Or people who still have clearances could receive a briefing. Are you really this dense?
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,596
2,358
113
biden could declassify the info. Or people who still have clearances could receive a briefing. Are you really this dense?
So with great public fanfare, and to prove your point, you point at information so classified that it can never be revealed? If it can never be revealed then how do you get to publicly point at it?

.....unless you fabricated it out of thin air.
.
 

VonMeister

Duke status
Apr 26, 2013
20,251
6,977
113
JOE BIDENS RAPE FINGER
IC pulled receipts on Team Chump.
Why do you consider unnamed sources receipts?

How could it be undetected at the time but detected years later...sounds a bit convenient to me.

There is no way a ballon got anywhere near Alaska...much less the continental US without the US military knowing about it. The Admin only said something after they got caught.
 

Hump

Phil Edwards status
Jan 10, 2002
5,948
2,321
113
Vancouver Island

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,596
2,358
113
What about this?

Seems many defense officials were loath to brief Trump about certain things for fear he'd somehow muck it up.
Also been widely known Trump disliked briefings and seldom read much.

Intelligence Officials Purposely Withheld Info From Trump: Report (businessinsider.com)

Spies Keep Intelligence From Donald Trump on Leak Concerns - WSJ

Report: Intelligence officials withhold information from Trump | The Hill

Food for thought for those of you who actually think.



Take care.

Oh I see. If an administration official withholds pressing national security information from a president, that's the president's fault.

.....or there was never any information to withhold to begin with.

But hey, your choice.
.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Hump

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,596
2,358
113
  • Haha
Reactions: Hump

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
69,164
21,652
113
The Bar
Oh I see. If an administration official withholds pressing national security information from a president, that's the president's fault.

.....or there was never any information to withhold to begin with.

But hey, your choice.
.
And Trump had such an outstanding track record at reading his Daily Briefs and anything more visually complex than a Denny's menu.
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,755
23,367
113
So with great public fanfare, and to prove your point, you point at information so classified that it can never be revealed? If it can never be revealed then how do you get to publicly point at it?

.....unless you fabricated it out of thin air.
.
squidliar, always the wrongest guy in the room...still running his mouth after NORAD commander has also gone on record explaining the situation

amazing...so much feels, so little grasp on reality

I mean...his argument is so fkn ridiculous...WHY DID BRANDON HAVE TO ""DEFLECT"" IN THE FIRST PLACE, SQUIDLIAR?

just unsane. all day long. every day.

your brain is rotten