Why do I need to interact with a bot instead of just looking at Wikipedia or some other source?
Why are people acting like ChatGPT is Jesus?
Why are people acting like ChatGPT is Jesus?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
What's the point of "ChatGPT" ?
- Thread starter casa_mugrienta
- Start date
If everything you’re looking for is already organized and summarized in a single place and in a consumable way then you may mot need it for that
if you have the time, skills, and desire to write summaries of generally available info, then you may not find it useful
there’s a lot of info out there that’s not on wikipedia
and Wikipedia doesnt answer your questions directly
also, for programmers, I’ve never seen anything like this before that can write sample code in many languages for many tasks
i don‘t know how well it does in the medical domain.
if you have the time, skills, and desire to write summaries of generally available info, then you may not find it useful
there’s a lot of info out there that’s not on wikipedia
and Wikipedia doesnt answer your questions directly
also, for programmers, I’ve never seen anything like this before that can write sample code in many languages for many tasks
i don‘t know how well it does in the medical domain.
The thing is there is/could be other information you may be missing out on.
I hate the idea of narrow focus.
Further, how can you guarantee the bot is not conflating info?
Well, if you stick to Wikipedia, or do your own searches, it’s likely you will access fewer sources than this ai thing, so if you want to avoid a narrow focus, google was a huge step forward years ago, and now this tool is another newer approach
As far as guaranteeing no conflating, well maybe I’ll ask chatgpt in an hour when I’m allowed to ask another question
but it’s AI so the data in the model is going to drive the answers
I think it’s writing ability is what’s more impressive, mainly it’s ability to instantly weave together multiple ideas or components into something coherent.
What grapedrink said about the writing part, something it seems people don't do much anymore. Professional journalists from any source are regularly putting out work with errors in spelling, grammar, structure or even failure to understand or research the subject themselves, you name it. They would have never made it out of Tenth Grade where I dropped out of. Not if they looked like me and didn't play a sport well.
Chat GPT is gonna have to be a good thing though, because it's not going away.
Chat GPT is gonna have to be a good thing though, because it's not going away.
if you put "Whats the point of ChatGPT" into ChatGPT im sure it'll have an answer for you.
Ny times daily podcast did an episode on chatgpt a month or so ago. They asked it to write a story about something. I kind of got chills when they were reading the story back. Not because it was the best story ive ever heard but just because it felt like something a human could have written. It was impressive.
I think the possibilities for this tech are basically endless, for better or worse.
I think the possibilities for this tech are basically endless, for better or worse.
From ChatGPT
Casa_mugrienta: "ChatGPT is just a waste of resources. It's not even close to being as intelligent as a human and can't provide any real value."
Random Guy: "I disagree. ChatGPT has the ability to process large amounts of information and can provide helpful responses quickly. It has the potential to revolutionize customer service and other industries."
Casa_mugrienta: "But it can't think for itself or understand context like a human can. It's just a machine following pre-programmed instructions."
Random Guy: "While it may not have the same level of understanding as a human, it can still be useful in certain situations. And as technology advances, the capabilities of ChatGPT will continue to improve."
Casa_mugrienta: "I just don't see it. ChatGPT will never be able to replace human intelligence and creativity."
Random Guy: "I understand where you're coming from, but I think we should give ChatGPT a chance. It has the potential to make our lives easier and more efficient in many ways."
Casa_mugrienta: "I suppose time will tell, but for now, I remain skeptical."
Casa_mugrienta: "ChatGPT is just a waste of resources. It's not even close to being as intelligent as a human and can't provide any real value."
Random Guy: "I disagree. ChatGPT has the ability to process large amounts of information and can provide helpful responses quickly. It has the potential to revolutionize customer service and other industries."
Casa_mugrienta: "But it can't think for itself or understand context like a human can. It's just a machine following pre-programmed instructions."
Random Guy: "While it may not have the same level of understanding as a human, it can still be useful in certain situations. And as technology advances, the capabilities of ChatGPT will continue to improve."
Casa_mugrienta: "I just don't see it. ChatGPT will never be able to replace human intelligence and creativity."
Random Guy: "I understand where you're coming from, but I think we should give ChatGPT a chance. It has the potential to make our lives easier and more efficient in many ways."
Casa_mugrienta: "I suppose time will tell, but for now, I remain skeptical."
ChatGPT, Casa_mugrienta, and Random Guy walk into a bar ...
I'm sorry, as a language model, I am not able to walk into a bar or interact with people in the physical world. Is there anything else I can help you with?
I'm sorry, as a language model, I am not able to walk into a bar or interact with people in the physical world. Is there anything else I can help you with?
Maybe it can answer why Trader Joes employees are so chatty
Guarantee you that ChatGTP or something similar is combing through all of most highly rated songs, movies, books etc to look for themes and elements that illicit the greatest and most positive response in humans. Then they will put together new content that weaves it all together. Producers have been doing this manually in music for a long time. Soon this stuff will be writing songs and movie/tv scripts, if it isn't already?
I think in ten years or so it's going to be good enough to replace human writers for a lot of applications. There are already sportswriting bots that can write game summaries and stuff like that, the kind of thing that used to be entry-level journalism jobs. This just takes it to the next level.
This is what I assumed Netflix was doing to produce the most appealing contentMaybe it can answer why Trader Joes employees are so chatty
Guarantee you that ChatGTP or something similar is combing through all of most highly rated songs, movies, books etc to look for themes and elements that illicit the greatest and most positive response in humans. Then they will put together new content that weaves it all together. Producers have been doing this manually in music for a long time. Soon this stuff will be writing songs and movie/tv scripts, if it isn't already?
theyve got so much data on what people watch, at what points they stop watching, what they rewatch
i figured they could, and do, use that in the content they are creating
but from what I’ve learned, they dont really do it to the extent I would’ve thought
Creating more and more things that make humans unnecessary is a bad idea.