Would you have adopted a non white baby?The adoption process is wacky, in general.
As for the wanting white babies. In California (at least) white couples are actively discouraged/prevented from adopting non-white babies by the system itself.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Would you have adopted a non white baby?The adoption process is wacky, in general.
As for the wanting white babies. In California (at least) white couples are actively discouraged/prevented from adopting non-white babies by the system itself.
Who’s doing that?So maybe having kids just for adoption purposes isn’t a good idea.
We did. She was given back to the mother. Mom’s boyfriend beat her to death.Would you have adopted a non white baby?
Why all the unwanted children?
They only want fresh white babies?
Making girls have babies so infertile families can have is very Handmaid's Tale.
Adopting kids is a tricky game.We did. She was given back to the mother. Mom’s boyfriend beat her to death.
Didn't you ever watch the show?
irony much?thank you for yet another substance filled contribution.
Thank you for yet another meaningless contributionirony much?
Not surprising. This is why full on binary approaches don’t work.Maternal morbidity and fetal outcomes among pregnant women at 22 weeks’ gestation or less with complications in 2 Texas hospitals after legislation on abortion
Recent state-level legislation on abortion has encroached on access to reproductive care with disproportionate effects on underserved communities.1 In Texas, 2 legislative actions have been at the forefront of this public health issue. Senate Bill 8 bans abortions once cardiac activity is...www.ajog.org
The journal article, published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, describes the experience of two large Texas hospitals over a period of eight months following that legislation. The authors, who care for patients at those hospitals, describe how their hospitals managed 28 women who presented at less than 22 weeks’ gestation with serious complications following the ban on abortion.
Without the ability to offer abortion to their patients, all 28 women were managed expectantly. This is a medical way of saying that they waited for something terrible to happen. That wait lasted, on average, nine days.
During that nine days of waiting, here is what was achieved for the babies: 27 of the patients had loss of the fetus in utero or the death of the infant shortly after delivery. Of the entire cohort, one baby remained alive, still in the NICU at time of the journal article’s publication, with a long list of complications from extreme prematurity, including bleeding in the brain, brain swelling, damage to intestines, chronic lung disease. and liver dysfunction. If a baby survives these complications, they often result in permanent, lifelong illnesses.
During those nine days of waiting for an immediate threat to maternal life, here is what happened to the women of that cohort: Most of them went into labor, or had a stillbirth, which meant the medical team could then legally intervene and empty the uterus. Fifty-seven percent of those pregnant women had some sort of complication, and for about a third of them, it was serious enough to require intensive-care admission, surgery, or a second admission to the hospital. One of the 28 patients ended up with a hysterectomy, which means she will never carry a pregnancy again. The authors of the article estimate, based on their pre-September practice, that about half of those maternal complications would have been avoided if immediate abortion had been offered as a choice. But of course, post-September in Texas, these women didn’t get a choice.*source*
Shouldn't have been vaccinated - you wouldn't have these problems.Maternal morbidity and fetal outcomes among pregnant women at 22 weeks’ gestation or less with complications in 2 Texas hospitals after legislation on abortion
Recent state-level legislation on abortion has encroached on access to reproductive care with disproportionate effects on underserved communities.1 In Texas, 2 legislative actions have been at the forefront of this public health issue. Senate Bill 8 bans abortions once cardiac activity is...www.ajog.org
The journal article, published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, describes the experience of two large Texas hospitals over a period of eight months following that legislation. The authors, who care for patients at those hospitals, describe how their hospitals managed 28 women who presented at less than 22 weeks’ gestation with serious complications following the ban on abortion.
Without the ability to offer abortion to their patients, all 28 women were managed expectantly. This is a medical way of saying that they waited for something terrible to happen. That wait lasted, on average, nine days.
During that nine days of waiting, here is what was achieved for the babies: 27 of the patients had loss of the fetus in utero or the death of the infant shortly after delivery. Of the entire cohort, one baby remained alive, still in the NICU at time of the journal article’s publication, with a long list of complications from extreme prematurity, including bleeding in the brain, brain swelling, damage to intestines, chronic lung disease. and liver dysfunction. If a baby survives these complications, they often result in permanent, lifelong illnesses.
During those nine days of waiting for an immediate threat to maternal life, here is what happened to the women of that cohort: Most of them went into labor, or had a stillbirth, which meant the medical team could then legally intervene and empty the uterus. Fifty-seven percent of those pregnant women had some sort of complication, and for about a third of them, it was serious enough to require intensive-care admission, surgery, or a second admission to the hospital. One of the 28 patients ended up with a hysterectomy, which means she will never carry a pregnancy again. The authors of the article estimate, based on their pre-September practice, that about half of those maternal complications would have been avoided if immediate abortion had been offered as a choice. But of course, post-September in Texas, these women didn’t get a choice.*source*
You clearly don't grasp the matter.Another GOP plan fails miserably
FDA says it will greenlight pharmacies to fill prescriptions for abortion pill — ABC News
Pharmacies would have to become certified and a prescription is still needed.apple.news
This is the stuff my son’s birth mother took in an attempt to kill him.Another GOP plan fails miserably
FDA says it will greenlight pharmacies to fill prescriptions for abortion pill — ABC News
Pharmacies would have to become certified and a prescription is still needed.apple.news
the matter of overturning Roe v Wade turning out to be a flop just like the Red Wave?You clearly don't grasp the matter.
At least the shithole Republican states get to make some women suffer.the matter of overturning Roe v Wade turning out to be a flop just like the Red Wave?
I'd say I have a pretty good read on the situation.
i doubt that will last very longAt least the shithole Republican states get to make some women suffer.
Now that Kansas of all places repudiated their Republican legislature at least on the abortion issue, I read where there are now movements in Repub-controlled states to restrict the people's ability to put pro-abortion propositions on the ballot. I guess democracy is not how you MAGA.i doubt that will last very long