Who did Peter Stzrok work for? You're just a troll with no intellectual honesty.Chump's FBI did him dirty? Is that what you're saying?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Who did Peter Stzrok work for? You're just a troll with no intellectual honesty.Chump's FBI did him dirty? Is that what you're saying?
who was in charge of the FBI? Who appointed him?Who did Peter Stzrok work for? You're just a troll with no intellectual honesty.
You're incapable of intellectual honesty in any debate. To go down this path you're on is ludicrous.....but there you are.who was in charge of the FBI? Who appointed him?
is there any idiotic conspiracy hypothesis you won't believe in?
So they definitely wanted to interfere but just in a really general and vague way.Not unrelated. The FBI had the laptop first and knew what was on it then went to social media companies and asked them to squash any reporting of it when they found out it was going to be used as an October surprise through their likely illegal surveillance of Trump's inner circle.
What makes you think there's any loyalty whatsoever?who was in charge of the FBI? Who appointed him?
is there any idiotic conspiracy hypothesis you won't believe in?
Yes, it's definitely Hunter's laptop, but in the leadup to 2020, the only person other than the FBI who had a copy of the hard drive was a skeletal moron who said sh!t like "truth isn't truth" and randomly butt-dialed reporters and tried to mess with the data to make a mountain out of the molehill.is there any proof the laptop is real?
freedom of speech =/= freedom of reach.So they definitely wanted to interfere but just in a really general and vague way.
But again, was the reporting squashed? Did the NYP not run the story and print it and feature it on their website and discuss it in every media outlet that would have them?
If the FBI wanted to kill a story why did they go to a news aggregator and not the actual news source?
PS - after his full review of the issue, why did Taibbi say he saw no evidence of FBI involvement at all?
what path am I on?You're incapable of intellectual honesty in any debate. To go down this path you're on is ludicrous.....but there you are.
So you get it. A true story that was not allowed on the farthest reaching media by corrupt actors.FB and Twitter chose not to allow links to the NYPost article. The NYPost article was not prevented from being hosted on their website.
Apparently the FBI is 100% loyal to Biden, even before he was president and even if they were Trump appointees.What makes you think there's any loyalty whatsoever?
Twitter is an aggregator. It’s not media. The NY Post is media.So you get it. A true story that was not allowed on the farthest reaching media by corrupt actors.
The Post was also kicked off Twitter for the TRUE story
I would like a media that tells the truth.
Obviously the Fed's and Social media giants disagree
Didn’t Stzrok get fired from the FBI?Who did Peter Stzrok work for? You're just a troll with no intellectual honesty.
Technicallly they are media now that Elon hired “journalists” in Taibbi and WeissTwitter is an aggregator. It’s not media. The NY Post is media.
You knew about it but those of us here probably all have a keen interest in politics unlike the average American.everyone knew about hunter biden's laptop - it was all over the news and internet.
the story was probably amplified even more b/c twitter attempted to quash.
true - but many use it to get all their news along with fb - that's just a realityTwitter is an aggregator. It’s not media. The NY Post is media.
No, you can only see photos of certain items from Hunter Biden's laptop that Rudy Giuliani and Rupert Murdoch calculated benefit Trump if you see them.Can we all see the contents of everyone else's laptops?
Yes - He also launched crossfire hurricane - the "insurance" in case trump got electedDidn’t Stzrok get fired from the FBI?