If you don’t understand how dangerous this precedent is, I guess I can’t help you.I understand your point exactly.
He is a dumb, misguided kid, but he was allowed to be there. It's an open carry state, so he was allowed to have the gun.
What exactly are you outraged about here? You wanted him to be found guilty and imprisoned for breaking laws that are not on the books but that you think should be on the books?
What media do you consume and what about it has led you to be infected by twitter narratives without ever logging in to twitter? Maybe it really is just this site... that would be pretty fascinating.
Nobody said he didn’t have the right to be there.
I questioned his motives, which are obvioius to anyone who is being honest.
He was there to stir sh!t with his rifle, he succeded and got away with it.
You also don’t seem to be familiar with the case or the laws - it’s not legal for minors to open carry in Wisconsin.
I’m not sure why are you obsessed with my media sources.
I’ve already said that I don’t read other people’s opinions because I find it boring and I don’t consume social media, except instagram which is 100% dogs, art, music and surf.
Don’t quite understand why you would think I’m not capable of forming an opinion.
Whatever opinions you have, I’m sure there are millions of others who share the same views.
Does that make your opinions somehow not authentic?