REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
***Official Impeachment Proceedings***
- Thread starter studog
- Start date
I've been saying this for a few years on the erBB and it's been met with nothing but criticism. Now their nihilism is on full display.
Also........a parade of witnesses. None of this is good for Trumby. To suggest otherwise is to live in an alternate reality.
Next up in impeachment hearings: A parade of key witnesses
WASHINGTON (AP) — Several more witnesses scheduled to testify in the House impeachment hearings over the next week are expected to say they too worried about President Donald Trump’s push for Ukraine to investigate Democrats as <a href="https://apnews...
apnews.com
I Don’t Know WHO to Believe In This Impeachment Hearing
This impeachment is so confusing. Both sides are making contradictory claims and it’s almost impossible to know who to trust. On the one hand, you ...
www.mcsweeneys.net
The nihilism is completely paritsan and hypocritical, the who cares attitude only applies to crimes committed by their team.
The administration is completely consumed by this impeachment process. Just look at Trumby's twitter account.
Also, what happened to the people saying there was no impeachment process? What say you now?
Also, what happened to the people saying there was no impeachment process? What say you now?
Who is the head of the branch of government charged with investigating such things? I'll give you a hint.......name starts with T and ends with rump.
From the New York Post. OUCH!!!!!!!!! 
Adam Schiff is wasting the nation’s time with impeachment hearings
By Post Editorial Board
In their first day of public impeachment hearings, Democrats made clear just how weak their case is.
In beyond-dull testimony, the Dems’ first witnesses, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent and US Chargé d’Affaires in Ukraine Bill Taylor, noted their displeasure with the fact that there were “two channels” (a “regular” and an “irregular” one) to Ukraine, and at some point the goals of the two diverged.
Taylor and Kent complained that President Trump conditioned US aid on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announcing that his country would investigate corruption, specifically: Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election and payoffs to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter.
That was a policy they disliked, because they feared it would weaken Ukrainian-American ties and Kiev’s ability to defend itself from Russia.
Sorry, but it’s not their place to second-guess Trump or his policies. The president sets foreign policy, not they; if he thought it was important for Ukraine to help uncover evidence of corruption, that’s his call.
As for helping Ukraine defend itself, Trump has done far more than President Barack Obama did, sending not only financial aid but lethal weaponry.
Neither Taylor nor Kent could even offer any direct, first hand evidence that Trump ever set such must-meet conditions — proof that should be essential to remove a duly elected president. Instead, they merely cited third- and fourth-hand rumors. Neither man ever had direct contact with the president.
And there’s evidence of just the opposite: Zelensky says he felt no pressure, and Ukraine didn’t even know the aid had been held up when he spoke to Trump during the July 25 call that set off the impeachment inquiry. Plus, the money was released without Ukraine announcing investigations.
Fact is, Democrats have already decided that Trump is guilty; the hearings are only meant to convince the public. Too bad for them that they’re so far only giving Americans more cause to be skeptical.
nypost.com
Adam Schiff is wasting the nation’s time with impeachment hearings
By Post Editorial Board
In their first day of public impeachment hearings, Democrats made clear just how weak their case is.
In beyond-dull testimony, the Dems’ first witnesses, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent and US Chargé d’Affaires in Ukraine Bill Taylor, noted their displeasure with the fact that there were “two channels” (a “regular” and an “irregular” one) to Ukraine, and at some point the goals of the two diverged.
Taylor and Kent complained that President Trump conditioned US aid on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announcing that his country would investigate corruption, specifically: Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election and payoffs to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter.
That was a policy they disliked, because they feared it would weaken Ukrainian-American ties and Kiev’s ability to defend itself from Russia.
Sorry, but it’s not their place to second-guess Trump or his policies. The president sets foreign policy, not they; if he thought it was important for Ukraine to help uncover evidence of corruption, that’s his call.
As for helping Ukraine defend itself, Trump has done far more than President Barack Obama did, sending not only financial aid but lethal weaponry.
Neither Taylor nor Kent could even offer any direct, first hand evidence that Trump ever set such must-meet conditions — proof that should be essential to remove a duly elected president. Instead, they merely cited third- and fourth-hand rumors. Neither man ever had direct contact with the president.
And there’s evidence of just the opposite: Zelensky says he felt no pressure, and Ukraine didn’t even know the aid had been held up when he spoke to Trump during the July 25 call that set off the impeachment inquiry. Plus, the money was released without Ukraine announcing investigations.
Fact is, Democrats have already decided that Trump is guilty; the hearings are only meant to convince the public. Too bad for them that they’re so far only giving Americans more cause to be skeptical.
Adam Schiff is wasting the nation’s time with impeachment hearings
In their first day of public impeachment hearings, Democrats made clear just how weak their case is. In beyond-dull testimony, the Dems’ first witnesses, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George …
nypost.com
Ouch and now CNN.com too.............................
www.cnn.com
Democrats are wasting America's time on impeachment | CNN
Where is the Democratic profile in courage, Scott Jennings asks, someone willing to stand up to Nancy Pelosi and call the House impeachment what it is: a norm-obliterating, kangaroo court run by a party that apparently has little confidence in its ability to beat Trump in the next election?
www.cnn.com
That dude is mischaracterizing up the ying yang. He's as dumb as grossfat stupid dad, with all gross fat stupid dad's talking points.Ouch and now CNN.com too.............................
Democrats are wasting America's time on impeachment | CNN
Where is the Democratic profile in courage, Scott Jennings asks, someone willing to stand up to Nancy Pelosi and call the House impeachment what it is: a norm-obliterating, kangaroo court run by a party that apparently has little confidence in its ability to beat Trump in the next election?
You posted a garbage tabloid opinion article, what do you want to talk about?
Because you're not interested in facts.
Only opinions of people who are as dumb as you.