REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Sidebar Sidebar

Newtown shooting victim families can sue gun-maker, Supreme Court allows

U

utoma

Nep status
Apr 19, 2019
772
190
43
laidback said:
I thought guns don't kill people, people kill people
Click to expand...

Have a test. Go into a school, give one guy a gun ask him to kill people.

Give another guy nothing, ask him to kill people.

See who kills more people before they are stopped.

Repeat this 100 times. Do a statistical analysis. I can guarantee the guy who gets a gun kills more people, outside a margin of error.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FecalFace
afoaf

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,919
23,556
113
my Sandy Hook hoaxer friend is gonna get trolled

seems like Alex Jones and Remington could have easily avoided massive
financial losses by simply proving that it was, in fact, a hoax and did not
actually happen.

if you prove that Sandy Hook is legitimately a fake, these cases gets thrown
right out.

why wouldn't they just show their proof....seems so easy....weird, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FecalFace
L

lagunaboy

Michael Peterson status
Apr 24, 2017
2,414
455
83
What if you marketed a hammer called “The Skull Crusher” and cited data in your adds about how many pounds per square inch it could obtain snd what damage it could do to a person’s skull. And then some 17 year old saved their allowance money and bought The Skull Crusher and crushed the skull of their little brother. Any liability?
 
...

...

Gerry Lopez status
Aug 29, 2019
1,107
175
63
This will never fly in court.

we have this thing called the 2nd amendment

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FecalFace
FecalFace

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
42,338
2,105
113
The Californias
GromsDad said:
Hell fukking no. The weapon manufacturer bears no responsibility when a criminal commits a crime using their product. Doesn't matter if its a gun, a knife, a baseball bat, a hammer or a ball point pen.
Click to expand...
Only one of those items was designed for no other use but for killing people in the most efficient manner.
It was finely tuned to kill as many people as possible, in the shortest amount of time possible.

Guess which one!
 
FecalFace

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
42,338
2,105
113
The Californias
GromsDad said:
What the fuk difference does it make? A human did this. Not an inanimate object.
Click to expand...
You just compared AR15 to baseball bats and ball point pen idiot. That's what difference it makes.

It's an animate object that mentally ill people use to kill as many people as possible in the shortest time possible.

And you are enabling them to do so. Be proud.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Share this page
Top Bottom