The armed services and defense industry created a lot of employment while LBJ was driving the bus.The poverty rate was 19% before LBJ. Pathetic. fook the 1950s; fook the horse the 1950s rode in on and fook the cow the 1950s dropped out of.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The armed services and defense industry created a lot of employment while LBJ was driving the bus.The poverty rate was 19% before LBJ. Pathetic. fook the 1950s; fook the horse the 1950s rode in on and fook the cow the 1950s dropped out of.
They leeched off a lot of productivity. You'd be better off with the Green New Deal.The armed services and defense industry created a lot of employment while LBJ was driving the bus.
Yes poverty magically dropped like a rock in the 60s and the 1940-1959 stretch had zero capacity to benefit by being across an ocean from the war, but the Great Society had nothing to do with it.The nation was still riding the coattails of being the only first world power that wasn't affected by WWII like our peers were. Pointing to the Great Society as something that changed the poverty rate by itself is dishonest at best
And some men want to go back 100 years because they can't stand the fact that women are taking charge of their lives and bodies.It seems women are just now learning to take control of their own lives. These things take time.
It seems women are just now learning to take control of their own lives. These things take time.
It seems conventional man finds the thought of being under a woman's control horrifying; many of them, of being unable to control her.And some men want to go back 100 years because they can't stand the fact that women are taking charge of their lives and bodies.
GDadie's worst nightmare.It seems conventional man finds the thought of being under a woman's control horrifying; many of them, of being unable to control her.
LOLIt seems conventional man finds the thought of being under a woman's control horrifying; many of them, of being unable to control her.
LULZThe statistics show that single moms have been failing.
LOL
Marrying the state instead of a man and raising cucked-out mutants like FF because they waited until their eggs were half dead isn't exactly what I'd call controlling their own lives. Not exactly a winning combo.
Poverty rates for children under 18 is currently reported at 16.2% Poverty rates for adults 18-64 is 10.7%.
That there's that big a difference between the two groups is not a good thing.
Technically, women don't need men to procreate, but men need the womb. Watch out that you don't get cut off.