It has basically been determined the election was stolen - now Hillary??

sizzld1

Phil Edwards status
Mar 31, 2009
7,400
1,391
113
casa_mugrienta said:
ifallalot said:
Look what you dipshits have done now.



He's better than Trump? :roflmao:
For Democrats, yes.

What they want is the thumb-up-their-ass Republican leadership and policies people voted against. That's their hope to take back the White House.

Nightmare scenario for them is if Trump makes it through the storm and stuff like tax reform gets passed.
Trump has shown zero ability to get anything done other than symbolic executive orders and doing everything in his power to make sure the environment gets fvcked (not just AGW related, so relax Surfdog). Maybe that will change if he is cleared of wrong doing...maybe not.
 

studog

Duke status
Jan 15, 2003
35,863
637
113
CA
casa_mugrienta said:
On the flip side there are also whispers to lay off calls for impeachment and hope Trump sinks the Repubelican Party.
blow up the "deep state" from within :shrug:

:roflmao:
 

casa_mugrienta

Duke status
Apr 13, 2008
43,971
18,574
113
Petak Island
sizzld1 said:
casa_mugrienta said:
ifallalot said:
Look what you dipshits have done now.



He's better than Trump? :roflmao:
For Democrats, yes.

What they want is the thumb-up-their-ass Republican leadership and policies people voted against. That's their hope to take back the White House.

Nightmare scenario for them is if Trump makes it through the storm and stuff like tax reform gets passed.
Trump has shown zero ability to get anything done other than symbolic executive orders and doing everything in his power to make sure the environment gets fvcked (not just AGW related, so relax Surfdog). Maybe that will change if he is cleared of wrong doing...maybe not.
As long as the controversy continues, nothing will get done.

That's the whole idea.
 

brukuns

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2014
10,042
4,919
113
Sao Paulo/Brazil
ifallalot said:
I guess you forgot that she still won the popular vote as well, Trump only won where it mattered due to our archaic Electoral College.
This. Blame the game. But I wouldn't worry, it shouldn't take long for Trump to do something so utterly stupid that there will be no choice but to impeach him.
 

sizzld1

Phil Edwards status
Mar 31, 2009
7,400
1,391
113
Does any Democrat give a single shite what Waters says? Do you ever see anyone other than Republicans raising her opinions? Glad Repugnants have identified their new boogey-woman though.
 

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
69,343
21,875
113
The Bar
sizzld1 said:
Does any Democrat give a single shite what Waters says? Do you ever see anyone other than Republicans raising her opinions? Glad Repugnants have identified their new boogey-woman though.
Nope.

And it's funny to see the mouth breathers like Mark Dice and his idiotic followers (who really are about as deranged as Waters) get up in arms over her. :roflmao:
 

GDaddy

Duke status
Jan 17, 2006
29,238
2,056
113
Carlsbad
The election was hardly stolen. HRCs campaign apparently said those things and did those things. If the disclosures actually were of effect on the outcome in the swing states - which I strongly doubt - blaming the messenger won't get you to a "stolen" election.

The catch-22 here is this: If you think the disclosures were of effect on the election you're also saying that she deserved to lose those votes based on that information, and conversely that she didn't deserve the votes of anyone whose vote depended on her omissions. OTOH, if you think the disclosures were not of effect on the election then there's still no logical basis by which to call the election stolen.



Now whether or not you support impeaching Trump on the manner in which he campaigned - as opposed to the mistakes he's made since he's been in office - that's perfectly fine. But IMO calling the election stolen is grossly overstating the case.