US unprepared for an asteroid strike, scientists say
By John Johnson, Los Angeles Times | July 5, 2008
PASADENA, Calif. - A group of scientists, joined by a member of Congress, used the 100th anniversary of the Tunguska asteroid event this week to draw attention to their belief that the United States is not doing enough to defend the planet against the dangers posed by near-Earth objects.
"We are not prepared at this time to prevent the massive death and destruction that would occur if an object from space hit the Earth as it did in Tunguska," Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, said at a news conference at the Pasadena, Calif., offices of the Planetary Society.
If an asteroid the size of the one believed to have exploded above Tunguska, in Siberia, were to explode over Los Angeles, he said, the destruction would range over much of Southern California.
Although no one is positive what caused the Tunguska event, which flattened trees over an 800-square-mile area on June 30, 1908, most scientists believe that an asteroid about 150 feet across exploded in the air above the remote river valley in eastern Russia. No one was killed in the event.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has established a Near-Earth Object Program Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena to monitor potentially dangerous asteroids. The most scrutinized is Apophis, which has about a 1-in-45,000 chance of hitting Earth in 2036, according to Don Yeomans, manager of the Near-Earth Object Program Office. Apophis is about five times the suspected size of the Tunguska object.
But Alan Harris, a senior research scientist at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo., said the greatest danger does not come from the objects we know about, but from the ones we haven't identified.
In one example of the lack of attention the issue receives in Washington, Rohrabacher said, funding for the Arecibo, Puerto Rico, radio telescope, which searches for near-Earth objects, is in danger in next year's budget.
If and when scientists are able to identify a potential killer asteroid, the deeper question is how to deflect it. Ideas have ranged from using nuclear weapons to blow it up to sending a spacecraft that would use gravity to drag the object off its destructive path.
By John Johnson, Los Angeles Times | July 5, 2008
PASADENA, Calif. - A group of scientists, joined by a member of Congress, used the 100th anniversary of the Tunguska asteroid event this week to draw attention to their belief that the United States is not doing enough to defend the planet against the dangers posed by near-Earth objects.
"We are not prepared at this time to prevent the massive death and destruction that would occur if an object from space hit the Earth as it did in Tunguska," Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, said at a news conference at the Pasadena, Calif., offices of the Planetary Society.
If an asteroid the size of the one believed to have exploded above Tunguska, in Siberia, were to explode over Los Angeles, he said, the destruction would range over much of Southern California.
Although no one is positive what caused the Tunguska event, which flattened trees over an 800-square-mile area on June 30, 1908, most scientists believe that an asteroid about 150 feet across exploded in the air above the remote river valley in eastern Russia. No one was killed in the event.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has established a Near-Earth Object Program Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena to monitor potentially dangerous asteroids. The most scrutinized is Apophis, which has about a 1-in-45,000 chance of hitting Earth in 2036, according to Don Yeomans, manager of the Near-Earth Object Program Office. Apophis is about five times the suspected size of the Tunguska object.
But Alan Harris, a senior research scientist at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo., said the greatest danger does not come from the objects we know about, but from the ones we haven't identified.
In one example of the lack of attention the issue receives in Washington, Rohrabacher said, funding for the Arecibo, Puerto Rico, radio telescope, which searches for near-Earth objects, is in danger in next year's budget.
If and when scientists are able to identify a potential killer asteroid, the deeper question is how to deflect it. Ideas have ranged from using nuclear weapons to blow it up to sending a spacecraft that would use gravity to drag the object off its destructive path.
