hal9000 said:
https://www.npr.org/2017/10/02/555092743/study-news-coverage-of-trump-more-negative-than-for-other-presidents
http://www.journalism.org/2017/10/02/a-comparison-to-early-coverage-of-past-administrations/
Newsflash: Being an asshole will get you worse press coverage. Also, Obama wasn't always a media darling.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/study-finds-harsh-media-coverage-for-obama/
here is a missing metric that is worth throwing into your analysis - where did the media companies place their bets prior to the election:
Among the United States' 100 largest newspapers by paid circulation, 57 endorsed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, while only two, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Florida Times-Union, endorsed Trump. Four (the Chicago Tribune, the Detroit News, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and the Charleston (South Carolina) Post and Courier) endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, while three other newspapers (USA Today, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel) specifically discouraged their readers from voting for Trump.
So, my boy Gary got more endorsements than Trump in the top tier
Here are the Totals
Clinton - 500
Trump - 28
Johnson - 9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper_endorsements_in_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016
So I am shocked, shocked to hear that Trump got unfavorable coverage in the early part of his term