this was already known weeks agoguidance changed so that makes the original guidance void?
is that the point of this dirty diaper thread?
the fact that we know more about contagiousness and lethality compounded
by the perceived need to physically support the emergent social movement
has nothing to do with it....we're just going to dismiss everything out of hand?
I mean, if we're (you're) so sure the protests are potentiated by the shelter in place
orders and number of people unemployed...why can't the inverse be true - that the
guidance from the medical community is tempered by the need to give people a
sense that they can express themselves politically while also maintaining some
semblance of safety?
all the calls to protest include requests to wear masks and stay home if you are
symptomatic or in an at risk demo.
but at least it was a catalyst to update the restrictions