REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Sidebar Sidebar

You kooks still support protesting in highways?

plasticbertrand

plasticbertrand

Duke status
Jan 12, 2009
21,833
14,665
113
Surfdog said:
Watch the SD video again. They were in at least 3 of the 4 lanes of freeway in dark of night with people driving 60-70+ coming out of nowhere. You know how many feet per second you travel at 60-70mph with people moving into almost the fast lane, with no warnings to slow down? At 70 you travel the length of a football field in 3 seconds. Surprised more idiot people didn't get hit.
Click to expand...
Wrong.

From the article:

Two climate activists climbed the north side of the bridge early Monday morning, saying in a press release that they were demanding that the government "halts all new oil and gas licenses and consents."

"They may not have directly caused the M20 accident," former Metropolitan Police detective chief inspector Mick Neville told The Sun. "But had their irresponsible demo not taken place, the women and van driver would probably not have been there."

1666488085447.png

The argument they're making is that the traffic jam (people slowing down and gawking) caused people to take the M20 (a different freeway) to bypass the bridge. The accident happened on the M20 and not where the protest took place.

The argument that "protestors have blood on their hands" is a stretch but it's Fox so who gives a sh!t.

Great trigger for the low information crowd. :poke:
 
Ifallalot

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
89,439
18,482
113
Surfdog said:
Watch the SD video again. They were in at least 3 of the 4 lanes of freeway in dark of night with people driving 60-70+ coming out of nowhere. You know how many feet per second you travel at 60-70mph with people moving into almost the fast lane, with no warnings to slow down? At 70 you travel the length of a football field in 3 seconds. Surprised more idiot people didn't get hit.
Click to expand...
I wish more did
 
  • Haha
Reactions: grapedrink and manbearpig
S

Surfdog

Duke status
Apr 22, 2001
21,803
2,033
113
South coast OR
plasticbertrand said:
Wrong.

From the article:

Two climate activists climbed the north side of the bridge early Monday morning, saying in a press release that they were demanding that the government "halts all new oil and gas licenses and consents."

"They may not have directly caused the M20 accident," former Metropolitan Police detective chief inspector Mick Neville told The Sun. "But had their irresponsible demo not taken place, the women and van driver would probably not have been there."

View attachment 140407

The argument they're making is that the traffic jam (people slowing down and gawking) caused people to take the M20 (a different freeway) to bypass the bridge. The accident happened on the M20 and not where the protest took place.

The argument that "protestors have blood on their hands" is a stretch but it's Fox so who gives a sh!t.

Great trigger for the low information crowd. :poke:
Click to expand...
I was talking about the San Diego incident video posted above, not these justh schtop it oil using deniers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Share this page
Top Bottom