i watched that loop for way too longYou don't understand the YOLO mindset. It can't be explained in words, but must be experienced. I'm no expert but this image may help you bridge the gap in understanding.
http://instagr.am/p/CfyeihADJX9/

REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
i watched that loop for way too longYou don't understand the YOLO mindset. It can't be explained in words, but must be experienced. I'm no expert but this image may help you bridge the gap in understanding.
http://instagr.am/p/CfyeihADJX9/
Epic. This is a scaled up custom correct? I’ve fondled the 5’11s before and they look like absolutely ripping good wave shortboards. Where did you order from? How long did it take?View attachment 133688
Driver 3.0 SITD replica just in. 6'0 x 19.25 x 2.5. Not particularly thrilled about the paint scheme, at least the logos are sort of minimalistic. The board itself however feels absolutely epic. Will sit between a Sub Driver 2 (5'11 x 19.5 x 2.44) and a Driver 2 round (6'2 x 19.25 x 2.44). Hoping it will get more use than the Had a stock Driver 2 6'1 squash a while ago, at the same volume the rails on the Driver 3 feel more refined and it's narrower through the tail.
Took the CC lane splitter out in some HH Santa Cruz waves yesterday. Will post up a more thorough review when I've had a chance to get a few sessions on it but initial feedback is super positive. For anyone considering this board, the biggest callout that I'd make is that this is definitely a high-performance twin IMO and it has a decent amount of rocker in the nose. It's very solid and positive off the back foot.It's going to be a very twinny fall. Lane Splitter against the Twinsquishman for fun. Does it get any better than this?!?!?
LS 5'8 x 19.5 x 2.5 vs. TSQM 5'7 x 20 x 2.35
The Lane Splitter has A LOT more rocker... the Twinsquishman is almost dead flat. Don't remember the Twinsman being quite that flat. I think they may have relaxed the rocker on this version.
View attachment 133456View attachment 133457
Asymmetric tail
All the CC boards I've fondled seem to have significant nose rocker and a lot of volume through the nose too.Took the CC lane splitter out in some HH Santa Cruz waves yesterday. Will post up a more thorough review when I've had a chance to get a few sessions on it but initial feedback is super positive. For anyone considering this board, the biggest callout that I'd make is that this is definitely a high-performance twin IMO and it has a decent amount of rocker in the nose. It's very solid and positive off the back foot.
It's hard to see it in the photo below but the Lane Splitter has way more nose flip and a bit more tail rocker than this Twinsman. When I look at that photo you posted above that looks like a good amount of nose flip and entry rocker to me. At least for a board that you might expect to be kind of a small wave twin fin.Doesnt look too rockered.
View attachment 133950
When showing the rocker it would be cool if you took a photo of the rocker.It's hard to see it in the photo below but the Lane Splitter has way more nose flip and a bit more tail rocker than this Twinsman. When I look at that photo you posted above that looks like a good amount of nose flip and entry rocker to me. At least for a board that you might expect to be kind of a small wave twin fin.
View attachment 133971
That's cold dawg. If folks really want a better rocker comparison shot I will oblige.When showing the rocker it would be cool if you took a photo of the rocker.
That's cold dawg. If folks really want a better rocker comparison shot I will oblige.
I dont need a rocker comparison but I'd love to hear a ride review comparison once you have had some time on the LS.That's cold dawg. If folks really want a better rocker comparison shot I will oblige.
Yeah for sure. I see overlap between these boards for sure don't see them totally being in the same category.I dont need a rocker comparison but I'd love to hear a ride review comparison once you have had some time on the LS.
Thanks