REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Pretty sure this doesn’t exist. Stretch buys this stuff and uses but probably has it custom made from a supplier.Just realized that biaxial fiberglass, by definition, is non-woven, so not what I'm looking for.
Does a direct-sized woven s-glass at 45-45 orientation (so there's no defined warp/weave beyond some nylon that may be needed for the weaving process) exist??? Anyone know?
Edit: I'll call a few suppliers next week.
This is sick. If I knew what I know now, my engineering education would look a lot different.I've done entire lams at the opposing diagonals and I always lay deckpatches at a diagonal. The idea is to distribute the stresses in more directions besides just the 0*-180* axis for the warp.
Over on Sways one of the geeks was doing a thesis for his engineering degree so he tested the different layups. He concluded that the optimum layup was 3-layers. One at the north-south axis like normal, and 2 more at opposing 30* angles (NW-SE and NE-SW). In that way the warp was running in 3 directions and the weft was running in 3 directions.
You can get opposing 30* angles on a shortboard using 56" or 60" wide cloth easily and without a whole lot of waste - just flip the roll on the 2nd cut. It's harder to do on a longer length, but even if you use a more shallow angle (like opposing 20* instead of 30*) you're still orienting the warp in different directions and you're avoiding the "nesting" that occurs when multiple layers of cloth and settling in with each other.
If you want to try it, another alternative is to just do it on a deckpatch, where all the compression occurs. I lay some deckpatches on top of the main lamination, 2-layers at opposing 30* angles, just barely fill the weave, and then do a quick pass with a sanding block over it to knock down any bumps. That really holds the wax.
The key is to use lighter weight cloths and doing the tight lamination.