When law enforcement doesn't look into sexual assault allegations.

[casa_mugrienta]

Wow you really put a lot of effort into that.

Better luck next time.

If you think that took effort you should give up now.

You're probably already putting too much effort in just recycling my old sh!t.

Luck, or lack thereof, doesn't play any part.

 

[manbearpig]

 

[GromsDad]

"...his friends pushed his penis into a female student's hands."

In other words, Kavanaugh was assaulted by whoever grabbed his penis, the female was then assaulted by whoever pushed his penis on her.

That's how this would play out in a court of law.

I was pretty anti-Kav based on the fact he clearly perjured himself.

But this is just another example of idiots that got Trump elected grasping at straws.

Bingo. Even if the accusation were true, at best you've got a drunken Kav pushed into or onto a drunken female by someone who was also drunk. Is this really what you guys want to claim is sexual assault? Is this the standard we should apply to democrats too? To all of you? Bullshit because even killing a woman is given a pass among democrats. This is nothing more than partisan dishonest games to sell books.

 

[Ifallalot]

So you post something from Washington examiner and in the following post you screech about fake news?

Irony at its finest right there.

Just because the Examiner leans right doesn't mean it's fake news. Its about the content contained within.

You're really far behind, we cleared all that up years ago

 

[GromsDad]

The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud | National Review

The authors omitted the fact that the alleged victim has no memory of the alleged incident.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[manbearpig]

Just because the Examiner leans right doesn't mean it's fake news. Its about the content contained within.

You're really far behind, we cleared all that up years ago

LMAO you’re just piling the irony up now.

Is that on purpose?

 

[GWS_2]

"Whoops." - New York Times.