What are college dorks protesting about?

Surfdog

Duke status
Apr 22, 2001
21,818
2,033
113
South coast OR
If that was supposed to be a "gotcha", it was weakest of sauce.

But hey, cover for and validate the anti-USA protesters all to Gaza and back.

It's what leftist MSM is today.
 

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,903
19,884
113
Jacksonville Beach
Cross dresser and transsexual opinions are not allowed unless they align with your political agenda?
No that's all good.

A given ilk with high-profile cd/ts on their side of the aisle criticizing a different ilk for the same is lolfail.

For example, if someone rather tangential, like say failed VP nominee and P candidate John Edwards used campaign money to pay off his side pieces, and the other ilk screamed bloody murder, and then the shoe was on the other, much more relevant, and very orange foot, it wouldn't be a witch hunt. It would be a (rare and satisfying) example of the powerful being held to account on both sides.

If, for example, a certain President's crackhead son was on the board of some company when a certain President was VP, and that was the end of the world over some seven digit figure, and then a different President's son in law failed to be honest enough to earn a security clearance two dozen times and got a no conditions 99 year loan to the tune of ten figures, well, that'd be quantitatively a thousand times worse in terms of the means, and no comparison in terms of the involvement in the administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bvendley

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
32,465
12,575
113
No that's all good.

A given ilk with high-profile cd/ts on their side of the aisle criticizing a different ilk for the same is lolfail.

For example, if someone rather tangential, like say failed VP nominee and P candidate John Edwards used campaign money to pay off his side pieces, and the other ilk screamed bloody murder, and then the shoe was on the other, much more relevant, and very orange foot, it wouldn't be a witch hunt. It would be a (rare and satisfying) example of the powerful being held to account on both sides.

If, for example, a certain President's crackhead son was on the board of some company when a certain President was VP, and that was the end of the world over some seven digit figure, and then a different President's son in law failed to be honest enough to earn a security clearance two dozen times and got a no conditions 99 year loan to the tune of ten figures, well, that'd be quantitatively a thousand times worse in terms of the means, and no comparison in terms of the involvement in the administration.
So, are you saying that Hal’s selective acceptance of cross dressers and gender transitioned people based on their political orientation is ok?
 

Sharky

Phil Edwards status
Feb 25, 2006
7,235
9,742
113
I‘m seriously starting to think RFK has a shot at this.

1714664063095.png