"We'll walk right into your home," she said...

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,754
2,536
113
The context of the clip is more that they wanted to be sure big wave boars were properly stored, and not just lying around for some kid to grab.

U.S. Constitution
Amendment 4
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

....The law which t-rumps all other laws.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
90,065
19,647
113
Everything you said is not spot on. To start, Coconut isn't anti second ammendment. She does want better background checks, as do you. She is not going to take away all your guns.

That line of fear-mongering gets used every single election cycle..... and yet gun ownership goes up and up and up.
It’s weird you still believe all that
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mundus

sirfun

Duke status
Apr 26, 2008
18,299
7,763
113
U.S.A.
Her job as an elected official is to prevent such constitutional violations from happening. Instead she suggests that they should happen.
It was the spring of 2018 and President Donald J. Trump, faced with an accelerating inquiry into his campaign’s ties to Russia, was furious that the Justice Department was reluctant to strike back at those he saw as his enemies.

In an Oval Office meeting, Mr. Trump told startled aides that if Attorney General Jeff Sessions would not order the department to go after Hillary Clinton and James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, Mr. Trump would prosecute them himself.

:roflmao:


 

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
61,120
18,420
113
Nobody is coming for your guns.

True story: My longtime AE had a felony gun charge going back over a year ago. He was moving and flipped his 4Runner on a highway exit ramp while transporting his firearms and foolishly had a round in the chamber of one of the guns. He was concussed and failed a roadside sobriety test that highway patrol gave him after emts told them he was concussed so they searched the vehicle and found the chambered weapon. Long story short he got a year of parole after endless legal nonsense and nobody informed him that he was supposed to surrender his firearms. Not the courts, or his lawyer. He found out almost a year later and this past week he tried to do the right thing and turn them in. Only they wouldn’t take them. Since he couldn’t legally transport them he got his sister to do it with him and they drove down to the police station with them and three days in a row he was told they had to come back the next day. Then they were told that they couldn’t turn them in and offficers would be sent out the following day to pick them up. Only they didn’t come for another three days. Dude was practically begging them to take his firearms so he could comply with the courts and he literally had to jump through hoops to get it done.

And people like Caca think that Kamala is gonna come door to door siezing guns? Didn’t we hear that tired trope from the NRA and their legion of scared gullible card carrying member for 8yrs of Obama?

Nobody is coming for your guns, even if they want to. With more guns than people in this country there’s not a chance that the govt will ever remove guns from the public. Anyone that thinks that on either side of the argument is living in fantasy land.
 
Last edited:
S

StuAzole

Guest
So we don’t worry about what politicians say anymore?

I’ll remember that next time you’re screeching about incitement or something
well then I’m far more concerned with Trump just being a dictator for a little bit than I am with Harris coming in to make sure my gun is properly stored!

Btw, you must be going nuts internally trying to figure out which Amendment covers searches and seizures hey?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chocki
S

StuAzole

Guest
Her job as an elected official is to prevent such constitutional violations from happening. Instead she suggests that they should happen.
you do realize that this statement was made in connection with the safe storage bill passed in CA in 2007 yes? That legislation, of course, made no reference to police conducting warrantless searches. Rather, it outlined rules related to safe gun storage, reported Violations of which could lead to criminal liability.

what’s weird about your hysterics here is that even if you take her literally rather than in the context of discussing actual legislation on the table, she didn’t even say there would be ramifications for unsafe storage. So the hypothetical result you’re so up in arms about is law enforcement busting in to help you properly secure your firearms and then leaving lol.
 

Pescado713

Gerry Lopez status
May 2, 2019
1,249
891
113
Big Beach
Nobody is coming for your guns.

True story: My longtime PO (parole officer) had a felony gun charge going back over a year ago. He was moving and flipped his 4Runner on a highway exit ramp while transporting his firearms and foolishly had a round in the chamber of one of the guns. He was concussed and failed a roadside sobriety test that highway patrol gave him after emts told them he was concussed so they searched the vehicle and found the chambered weapon. Long story short he got a year of parole after endless legal nonsense and nobody informed him that he was supposed to surrender his firearms. Not the courts, or his lawyer. He found out almost a year later and this past week he tried to do the right thing and turn them in. Only they wouldn’t take them. Since he couldn’t legally transport them he got his sister to do it with him and they drove down to the police station with them and three days in a row he was told they had to come back the next day. Then they were told that they couldn’t turn them in and offficers would be sent out the following day to pick them up. Only they didn’t come for another three days. Dude was practically begging them to take his firearms so he could comply with the courts and he literally had to jump through hoops to get it done.

And people like Caca think that Coconut is gonna come door to door siezing guns? Didn’t we hear that tired trope from the NRA and their legion of scared gullible card carrying member for 8yrs of Obama?

Nobody is coming for your guns, even if they want to. With more guns than people in this country there’s not a chance that the govt will ever remove guns from the public. Anyone that thinks that on either side of the argument is living in fantasy land.
fixed
 
S

StuAzole

Guest
BON? No.

Employers? Yes.

Again, it's normal not to want to have marks on your record, conviction or not. It's a hassle and it can come back to bite you.

And another thing - HR departments do stuff that violates employment law all the time, they just don't get caught.

I'm not sure why you're so vested in this. Do you have services to offer?
we’ll let me know the next time an HR department breaks the law in reviewing an application you submit and I’ll get you a good employment litigation attorney.