Von Sol 'Time Machine' - Review and Pics

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
Been meaning to post up a proper review of this board since I've been very stoked
with it and several people have asked me about it, so here goes...

I've been intrigued by this design since I first saw a few of them in Surfride a while
back. I've missed having a single fin since I sold my Spacecake a few years back
and the Time Machine 'spoke to me' more than any of the others with similar outlines I've
seen on the racks or in pics.
I saw this one posted on Clist and knew it was a friend of mine selling it. Apparently
it was one of Mattison's personal boards he had picked up from Sean. I had a
feeling it might be a touch less volume than I prefer as it's 2 7/16" and all of
my boards are 2 5/8" or 2 3/4", but the length and width were spot on and I figured
the width forward would be comfortable enough to at least try out and see if I
wanted a bigger one.

Me: 6'3", 205ish
Board: 6'2" x 20 5/8" x 2 7/16", eps/epoxy glassed by Surfcraft

First impression when I hit the water was then the board paddles very comfortably.
I don't like narrow nosed boards anymore and the Time Machine has plenty of
width/curve up front and paddled very well, even though the volume is a touch
lower for me. I had it setup as a 2+1 for the first two sessions with a 7" SurfySurfy
center fin I got from JP. First wave I paddled for, I really didn't think I'd catch as
it was a bit fat and I was out further than I should have been. Surprisingly, the
board glided into the wave relatively easily and I dropped down wanting
to see how it felt on a bottom-turn. The board laid over on a rail and shot me back
up the face quicker than I expected and cruised down the line without much rider
input needed. Smooth. Over the next several waves and next session, I tried
both dropping straight down and laying into hard bottom turns and angling in
with an immediate high pump for speed runs both front and backside with equal
success. The board likes to do arcing, driving carves with this fin setup and is
plenty fast to make sections and utilize the whole wave. It didn't feel like it wanted
to do snappy turns with this config...but that was to be expected. Buttery and
smooth was the call. Since then I've ridden it a bunch of times as a quad with
both the Von Knight quad set and also Griffin fronts with VK rears in everything
from waist-high beachbreak with a little curve to overhead beach and reefbreak
waves. For me so far, the quad is the ticket. The board still has that smooth
feeling and flow, but I'm able to pump through sections and redirect a bit quicker
off the top when needed. Although it has pretty minimal rocker, that pulled
in tail really handles steeper faces and drops well and feels perfect in the pocket
of a speedy wave. I definitely don't prefer to surf backside, but I've had a bunch
of head-high racers on my backhand that I've been shocked I've made as the TM
just rockets down the line right in the hook, feeling super solid and nimble. When
the opportunity presents itself to hook off the bottom and whip quickly off the top
at full speed, the board shines. The fact that it's equally comfortable front and
backside is a huge plus.
The forward width/volume, I think, gives the board a big boost in wave-catching
ability despite the lower (for me) volume. I touch more nose rocker would probably
make late/steep drops a tad easier, but I've been surprised how solid a few have
felt that I thought I'd pearl. Mattison actually just tweaked the file to make this
change and sounds very happy with it in a wide variety of sizes from 5'11" to 6'9".

So...I picked this thing up thinking I'd likely need a bigger one, and I may order
another with a little more foam for when there's a lot of water moving around or
I need to cover a lot of ground around the lineup, but this board has been a blast
and I'm really happy to have it in the quiver. IMO, with the pulled in round-pin
tail, the board likes a wave with a bit of curve much more than flatter faced waves,
but it's pretty versatile, especially with all of the possible fin configurations (SM
said he liked this one with big twins and a nubster, actually). I think it's a damn
good design! :wave2:



 

retodd

Duke status
Feb 23, 2009
16,764
2,222
113
what are the bottom contours ?

looks like it has a channel ?

stoked you are digging the board , it sure does look nice
 

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
retodd said:
what are the bottom contours ?

looks like it has a channel ?

stoked you are digging the board , it sure does look nice
Single concave starting just below the nose, to inset double ahead of the fins into
that deeper channel through the fins into flat off the last couple inches off the tail.
:facelick:
 

win-win

Michael Peterson status
Jul 12, 2007
2,762
0
36
Looks like a board and dims I am looking for. I did not know you can put a nubster in that single fin box.

Good review as always.

Merry Christmas.
 

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
Saw Sean in the water today and was able to check out the updated TM
he had in his van in both 6'0" and 6'9" versions. Things looked awesome. At thicker
center dims, they still had very nicely foiled (and slightly more 'down') rails
and a bit more nose rocker and tad bit more tail rocker. Looked and felt great in
the smaller and bigger size. Probably ordering one bigger than my current.
 

KyleTalbott

Nep status
Jul 6, 2008
864
86
28
Yeah that's what Sean was saying to me recently when I asked about what would be a good Shadow step up. He said he had tweaked the rocker and foiled the rails. Not that his word isn't good enough to go on but your confirmation helps. As well, these pics further stir the pot. I think I can sell 2 boards to facilitate getting one of these.

Whoot! Happy New Year indeed!
 

surf1atmalibu

Legend (inyourownmind)
Nov 4, 2009
381
0
0
O'slide, why would I want a Time Machine if I have a Hornet? ( I have neither, but I would consider adding to my VS quiver).
 

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
Deepism said:
Yeah that's what Sean was saying to me recently when I asked about what would be a good Shadow step up. He said he had tweaked the rocker and foiled the rails. Not that his word isn't good enough to go on but your confirmation helps. As well, these pics further stir the pot. I think I can sell 2 boards to facilitate getting one of these.

Whoot! Happy New Year indeed!
Haha...yes, good step up imo but will also do well in average waves.
Think I'm going to pull the trigger on a 6'4".
Also, with the more foiled/down rails, even his 6'9" at 2 3/4" had a very
nice crisp rail, fyi.
 

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
dumelocal said:
O'slide, why would I want a Time Machine if I have a Hornet? ( I have neither, but I would consider adding to my VS quiver).
IMO, the Hornet leans just slightly more towards the hpsb side of the board spectrum.
Shorter and wider or with wider tails they can be hp rippers or stretched out
with a round pin they can handle size and juice. Little narrower nose.
The TM has a little more width/curve up front...not too far off of the Shadow,
then is all business in the back with a pulled in rp tail (see pics).
I've had several Hornets of varying dims/tails, all of which were very good boards.
I'm digging the outline of the TM and how smooth and flowing it feels, especially
in decent-better waves. Personal preference, I guess.
 

surf1atmalibu

Legend (inyourownmind)
Nov 4, 2009
381
0
0
Havoc_Bro said:
nice review o-slide. a step up to the shadow looks like a great idea!

my rp hornet is pretty fun but the time machine prly have earlier entry and more alt feel.
I'm all about early entry.
 

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
Since the surf is absolutely cranking, I thought I'd better order a new board to
handle it! So...have a 6'4" x 20 3/4" x 2 3/4" (foiled) Time Machine in the
queue now. Slightly more rocker and little more foam overall should eat up
both whatever my local beachbreaks can handle and a few reefs south when there's
a bit of size and water moving. :jam_on:
 

Colin

Gerry Lopez status
Oct 11, 2005
1,244
4
0
east oahu
silentbutdeadly said:
As I said before, definitely the best looking Von Sol I've seen.
Yep. The first Von Sol I've seen that I'd want to try. Nice pics and reviews. Always enjoy a thread with some useful informational content.

Not to thread jack but has anyone tried that Haydenshapes Cannon single fin?
 

Oceanslide

Kelly Slater status
Mar 5, 2008
9,733
2,426
113
Oceanside, CA
Colin said:
silentbutdeadly said:
As I said before, definitely the best looking Von Sol I've seen.
Yep. The first Von Sol I've seen that I'd want to try. Nice pics and reviews. Always enjoy a thread with some useful informational content.
:cheers:

Grg, how different are the dims on your Shadow to the TM on order?
Imo, there will def be a place for both in your quiver.

 

grg

Phil Edwards status
Mar 11, 2006
6,053
1,355
113
Tuna Town/Baja
Its 3 inches bigger, about the same width and thickness but tapered rails. I felt up his that was about the same size and it feels good under the arm. Will be def. more manueverable I bet.

cant wait to give it a go