REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Retodd had a hyperfenuvion:
Just use the whole box - waste of time to cut in 1/2 and option to try a forward position
Agreed, why make your fin attachment weaker on purpose?'
One of these fins is doing its own thingAgreed, why make your fin attachment weaker on purpose?'
This is not a hyperfenuvion, no. It is only a tribute:
5'3" x wide and thicc, more thickness than rocker in fact
On my 6'2" Jobson shortboard, I measured the mains at 8 5/8" from the tail and a 1 1/2" gap between the mains and the canard. The main fin trailing edge was also 1 5/8" in from the hard edge of the rail, that is something that isn't mentioned as much.
Two for the price of one. And because using the whole box will interfere with a FCSII box and you'll have to cut one anyway. And you are overbuilding. With g-10 fins you can reduce the fin tab size and still have adjustability. I will guarantee with my word that g-10 tab will not break.
I’m not understanding how a full fusion box interferes more than a 1/2- could you post a pic of what you’re describing. Respectfully disagree on all other points.
There is somewhere on here a guy who uses two FCSII boxes, but to fit them he cuts one where the other "overlaps." I'm not going to search the thread or the forum trying to find it. I imagine the fitment of two fusions would be similar? Of course that depends on fin placement. If you have negative overlap and a wide slot maybe you're OK. PS Found pics and two fusions do not interfere (Griffins).
Thanks for posting the pic, but still don’t understand why 1/2 a fusion box will work for you but a full one won’t… but IRDGAF at this point. when someone uses the word “indisputable” I’m out.There is somewhere on here a guy who uses two FCSII boxes, but to fit them he cuts one where the other "overlaps." I'm not going to search the thread or the forum trying to find it. I imagine the fitment of two fusions would be similar? Of course that depends on fin placement. If you have negative overlap and a wide slot maybe you're OK. PS Found pics and two fusions do not interfere (Griffins).
The two for the price of one is an incontestable fact. And it take ten minutes or so to scribe and cut the box. You do have to make a router jig but it's a circle so not hard to do and once it's done there you have it. Finally, if you can break that single G-10 tab that is 1/8" smaller than a regular fiberglass or plastic tab, your turns have WAY more power than mine. Good on you!
PS the FCS tabbed canard I had, I realiz it sits in a wood stringer so that may have a lot to do with why I never had issues. Oh, and I've never broken the tabs on my wood fins (3 layer of 4 oz each side with 1/8" carbon rod). And I think a G-10 tab is much stronger.
View attachment 191745
A full one will work but is not necessary.
The Fang channel is back! YES! worth the effort.
and he'll do whatever I tell him.Those fins look to be about 10 inches from the tail of the board. Is that about right? How does it feel riding it as a Twin vs riding it as a Twinzer?
What a beauty. What are the dims on this? Would you mind specifying fins and canards positions?
usedsurf.com
