watch the video and show me what’s facts are slanted by Fox News Oh great one.Framing effect's effect on the framer(s).
These slanted self serving frames are rising up out of the subconscious without the framer's awareness of what is happening.
What is a trip is if you look for it, you can see your own frames arising out of the black muck that is your subconscious intuitive mind.
I see them now and go, Huh.
For sure, Fox knows how to play the biases of its audience.
Step back and make your best attempt at discrediting the video in the opening post of this thread. Go!
nprFox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.www.npr.org
What provocation? Quite frankly, given the conduct of the hostile crowd I wouldn't have a problem with a citizen raising a rifle to back up hostiles. That is NOT provocation in my opinion even IF what you claim were true.Can you tell us why Tucker didn't address the provocation that Judge Bruce identified?
>heheho< We'll excuse Tucker his omissions. He's just a hack.What provocation? Quite frankly, given the conduct of the hostile crowd I wouldn't have a problem with a citizen raising a rifle to back up hostiles. That is NOT provocation in my opinion even IF what you claim were true.
And? Its not a persuasive argument even if you could prove he pointed the gun which I don't believe has been proven. It is not unreasonable for an armed person to point a weapon at an advancing threatening mob. That is not provocation, it is part of the self defense response.>heheho<