Phil Edwards status
- Oct 11, 2009
Wouldn't investigating Hillary's emails be "dirty 3rd world politics"?Has the Statute Of Limitations passed for the 2,000 classified documents found on Hillary's illegal server? Asking for a friend.
irrelevant in this context. see above - you continue to fail to grasp the facts at hand.
one more time: "whatabout" is not a defense. got it yet?.
Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals 101: Accuse your opposition of the wrongdoing which you are performing.
We saw a perfect example when Adam Schiff et al accused Trump of doing exactly what Biden did, withholding foreign aid money to force the Ukraine government to do something. In Biden’s case it was to fire the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma. Biden was successful, and the prosecutor was fired. Go ahead and deny it. Here’s proof from the horse’s mouth
In today’s case, again with no evidence whatsoever, the left is accusing Trump of selling nuclear secrets.
Is Biden selling nuclear secrets? Why yes. Yes he is.
The upper class uses their political connections to become richer. They make deals with corrupt foreign companies and there is no disclosure required. These deals are made with bad actors who are trying to steal U.S. secrets.www.independentsentinel.com
…..Peter Schweizer traced the use of the money and found some other seeming pay-to-play connections. For example, Hunter Biden was involved in a nuclear company CGN which a year later was indicted by the DoJ for stealing U.S. nuclear secrets. A senior engineer admitted he was trying to steal circuits for China and he was sent to jail.
One deal for the Chinese Communists had to go through CIFIUS because it has national security implications.
To give a better understanding of how serious these deals are, Schweizer told Hannity of one deal that involved selling off technology that would push China towards their goal of Naval supremacy.
The United States is a world leader in nuclear technologies and in the case of China, CGN was interested in the Westinghouse reactor AP!000 because it is similar to the one put on U.S. Navy subs. This is important because China is making a push to pass the U.S. Navy in naval supremacy by 2030. This Chinese Communist company wants this nuclear propulsion technology to give them the big push. The son of the former vice president and the son of the former secretary of state are investors in the company….
----------------------------------------------If this Documentary were featuring Trump and equivalent Russian ties, voices across the political spectrum would be demanding his resignation. But Biden is a Democrat, so ... crickets.clashdaily.com
…..THE FILM REVEALS A WEALTH OF NEW DETAILS, INCLUDING:
* HUNTER BIDEN’S FIRM INVESTED IN A CHINESE NUCLEAR COMPANY THAT WAS ACTIVELY STEALING NUCLEAR SECRETS FROM THE UNITED STATES;
* BIDEN’S FIRM INVESTED IN CHINESE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY;
* BIDEN’S FIRM HELPED CHINA IN ITS QUEST TO CONTROL THE WORLD’S STRATEGIC METALS;
* BIDEN’S FIRM BOUGHT A COMPANY THAT PROVIDES DUAL USE TECHNOLOGIES TO THE CHINESE MILITARY
* POLITICAL PRESSURE FORCED HUNTER BIDEN TO RESIGN FROM THE BOARD OF HIS CHINA INVESTMENT FIRM IN LATE 2019 BUT, ACCORDING TO THE “RIDING THE DRAGON,” BIDEN QUIETLY MAINTAINS A MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR OWNERSHIP STAKE IN THE FIRM…..
There was probable cause to get a judge or magistrate to sign off on the search warrant. That's more than the "shred of evidence" you claim is lacking.Raising speculative innuendos about something without providing a shred of evidence is not anything which requires the first word of a response.
There was probable cause to get a judge or magistrate to sign off on the search warrant. That's more than the "shred of evidence" you claim is lacking.
It is beyond ironic how many rightwingers are on public assistance.
lol1. You're only speculating that this was a legal search. The timing strongly indicates that it was tied to Trump's peepeegate lawsuit.
2. The leftist accusations that the search warrant is tied to some other Trump wrongdoing is made up out of whole cloth. Provide one shred of evidence or even timing which backs up your baseless accusations.
One source said Trump only began making plans to leave the White House after January 6, his final two weeks in office, after months of baselessly claiming he had won the election.
"It was a chaotic exit," the source told NBC. "Everyone piled everything — staff, the White House movers — into the moving trucks. When they got to Mar-a-Lago, they piled everything there in this storage room, except for things like the first lady's clothes. Everything in a box went there."
The source said Trump was in a "dark place" at the time and that "he didn't care about the boxes," adding: "If you had brought him into that storeroom, and asked, 'Which are your presidential papers?' he couldn't tell you."
Doesn't sound implausible or inconsistentNBC?
There is no evidence here. Who is this anonymous "source", the dildo who wrote your stupid trash? Where does he say that this alleged information has anything to do with the Trump search warrant?
See? When you idiots keep throwing up baseless garbage like this when does it become time to stop paying any attention?