Trying to sue advertisers for not advertising on Twitter after he told them to "fook themselves". Defend this one fangirls.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
EDS.Of course he is suing in the corrupt third world shithole of Texas, Judge is probably pre bribed.,
You consider factually calling out scumbag billionaires derangement, speaks volumes about your character. or do you want Elon to be your daddy like the rest of the fangirls?EDS.
Money equals speech , the advertisers were just using their free speech rights given to them by citizens united.If he can prove they colluded (they most likely did) to harm "X" he may have a solid case.
If EE's (Evil Elon) attorneys can prove that the advertisers colluded to harm X by pulling their advertising as a group, he may have a very strong case.Money equals speech , the advertisers were just using their free speech rights given to them by citizens united.
We will see, it certainly is blatantly unethical. We all know RW judges will ignore the law and precedence if bribed, see supreme court. Let me guess you the think the Cyber Truck is a quality vehicleIf EE's (Evil Elon) attorneys can prove that the advertisers colluded to harm X by pulling their advertising as a group, he may have a very strong case.
articles are reporting that Twitter post-takeover was no longer adhering to the trade group's standards and so members withheld monies for ongoing workIf he can prove they colluded (they most likely did) to harm "X" he may have a solid case.
I won't argue that withholding payment for not adhering to standards is legit and I agree that these companies are well counselled on how to avoid Sherman Act violations. However, it wouldn't be the first time the well counselled stepped on their richards. That is why I worded my responses with "can prove" and "may".articles are reporting that Twitter post-takeover was no longer adhering to the trade group's standards and so members withheld monies for ongoing work
none of these organizations strike me as the type that would be casually running afoul the Sherman act
whereas it is well known that Musk is a petty bitch
the choice in venue is suss
his last tantrum-lawsuit against CCDH (or whatever that nonprofit was) just got dismissed
even if he wins this, he's still a fkn loser
Listen man, Mundus isn't interested in any of that - he's mad that his handle 'mundus' so closely resembles 'musk' and is doing anything he can to make it known that consumes a lot of main stream mediaI won't argue that withholding payment for not adhering to standards is legit and I agree that these companies are well counselled on how to avoid Sherman Act violations. However, it wouldn't be the first time the well counselled stepped on their richards. That is why I worded my responses with "can prove" and "may".
Not a fan boy of Musk at all but If he has a case, he has a case.
You really are dumb, sad attempt.
Pathetic cuck defending daddy, so predictable. You buy your cyber truck yet?Listen man, Mundus isn't interested in any of that - he's mad that his handle 'mundus' so closely resembles 'musk' and is doing anything he can to make it known that consumes a lot of main stream media
Pathetic cuck defending daddy, so predictable. You buy your cyber truck yet?
how was your day?Pathetic cuck defending daddy, so predictable. You buy your cyber truck yet?
lol no.If he can prove they colluded (they most likely did) to harm "X" he may have a solid case.
Oh man. He must be having a doozy.how was your day?