this thread would be better if people just said what they think the possible outcomes could be if the court rules in either direction.
responding to one another seems to yield nothing
responding to one another seems to yield nothing
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The most terrifying case of all is about to be heard by the US supreme court
- Thread starter maybe
- Start date
Possible outcomes include state legislatures choosing electors for the candidate who lost that state's vote, and the people of the state (i.e. the voters) having zero recourse.
and somehow ifallalot thinks this is optimal because lolkull kunt roll derp derp
TERRIFYING
Funny how you're all fans of the Electoral College now
Funny how you're all fans of the Electoral College now
Now read the case and tell us what you actually think, in your own words
You are so fucking Deaf dude. We are not fans of the EC. Just the opposite. Local Electors could not change an election if it was one person one vote.
Authoritarian now being the unmitigated gall to question the orthodox leftist collective.
Are you going to even try to answer Ifall's question, or just continue with the old 'last grape in the fruit bowl' routine?
The narrowest case concerns gerrymandering, which this case would essentially green light. Once implemented, ISL theory could be extended to fully gerrymandered state legislatures completely and without any checks and balances controlling state elections, up to and including the selection of electors.
And I am not a fan of the Electoral College, without which we would never have been subjected to President Trump.