REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The most terrifying case of all is about to be heard by the US supreme court
- Thread starter maybe
- Start date
The Heritage Foundation wants a payday for their investment.
The dog has caught the car.
The far right has captured the court.
The dog has caught the car.
The far right has captured the court.
Last edited:
Authoritarian governments happen all the time.If the court upholds the rogue ‘Independent State Legislature’ theory, it would put the US squarely on path to authoritarianism
TERRIFYING
You're laughing like you don't think it can happen here.
All great republics fall eventually.
What would you call it if a state legislature looks at a vote and says "nope, we don't like it, this is the result we're prefer"?
Of course it would not bother an Authoritarian like you.If the court upholds the rogue ‘Independent State Legislature’ theory, it would put the US squarely on path to authoritarianism
TERRIFYING
This is why you people are clowns
How is moving control more locally and more individually authoritarian?
TERRIFYING
Are purposely this obtuse, or just really dumb and brainwashed. Just so you are on the record, it is ok for state legislatures to overrule the voters? Noting authoritarian about that right?
Moron. Officials could determine what slate of electors gets put forth to the electoral college, regardless of the outcome of the state’s popular vote.
He is a textbook authoritarian reactionary with a severe case of Dunning-Kruger.
Like always, you misunderstand the possible implications of a ruling that fully grants proponents what they're asking for. Fortunately, the SCOTUS almost never drafts opinions with such a broad brush, and this case will be decided on a very specific and limited basis.
6th Amendment?
You thought that imposing a mask mandate in the middle of a pandemic is authoritarian.
This is how much you understand authoritarianism.
You are the definition of a clown.
I stopped reading when I reached the quote below because the writer of the opinion piece is clearly a deranged lunatic pushing THE BIG LIE.
"A supermajority of six, unelected ultraconservatives justices – five of which were put on the bench by presidents who did not win the popular vote –"
"A supermajority of six, unelected ultraconservatives justices – five of which were put on the bench by presidents who did not win the popular vote –"
