Ah, but that’s what makes him so good at this game
He does the things everyone knows he shouldn’t do
This one could be epic!
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Shutting down Twitter.....
- Thread starter hal9000
- Start date
He does the things everyone knows he shouldn’t do
This one could be epic!
theres alot of truth to this. not everyone should have the megaphone though and while i enjoy looking at cool stuff on insta eventually I will give it up all together like I did with FB and Titter.
Do you guys consider places like the erbb social media? I do not because the message board has been around since the beginning of the internet but I guess it could fall into that category.
IMO, people already make a distinction between trash content vs serious content, and have been for a long time. The supermarket tabloids and personality magazines are trash, and few of those readers take that content seriously. They just read it for the entertainment factor. Those tabloids are no threat to human civilization.
Trash Radio/podcasts are a thing - not a threat to the Republic
Trash TV is definitely a thing, starting with every program E entertainment airs - still not a threat.
So why should we interpret it any differently for content on Twitter or Facebook or in any other outlet? The "Authoritative Voices' don't attain that status by proclamation or decree or by self-declaration - they EARN the trust of their readers with their content and that trust is highly dependent on them following through every time. If one or more of these outlets get caught lying either by commission or omission that's their own fault, not the fault of the readers who decide the outlet's credibility is questionable.
There is no legitimate reason for any of Jim Acosta's viewers to be aware of his politics. (just one example) If he is being ilked that way it's entirely his own fault. The same with probably 80% or more of all the others whether they lean left or right.
Trash Radio/podcasts are a thing - not a threat to the Republic
Trash TV is definitely a thing, starting with every program E entertainment airs - still not a threat.
So why should we interpret it any differently for content on Twitter or Facebook or in any other outlet? The "Authoritative Voices' don't attain that status by proclamation or decree or by self-declaration - they EARN the trust of their readers with their content and that trust is highly dependent on them following through every time. If one or more of these outlets get caught lying either by commission or omission that's their own fault, not the fault of the readers who decide the outlet's credibility is questionable.
There is no legitimate reason for any of Jim Acosta's viewers to be aware of his politics. (just one example) If he is being ilked that way it's entirely his own fault. The same with probably 80% or more of all the others whether they lean left or right.
doesn’t Cotton Candy Hair have anything else on his agenda, like managing a deadly pandemic?
Trump retweets tweet from account named “Trump is Dumb, Sloppy and Moist”
MASTER OF THE INTERNETZ
MASTER OF THE INTERNETZ
1. Twitter's method of escaping liability over claims made against Twitter is to claim that Twitter does not regulate content .....that Twitter is merely a platform for the views of anyone who signs up. In "fact-checking" (opposing) the views expressed by the President of the United States Twitter has removed itself from the status of "platform", and placed itself in a position of participant. Not only does Twitter become liable for this opinion, but it removes Twitter's liability protection for everything ever posted on Twitter.
2. There are Federal Election Commission (FEC) laws governing how much money can be contributed "in kind" to a candidate, and requiring full disclosure of the contribution. When Twitter "fact-checked" Trump Twitter referred readers to NBC and CNN two of the biggest ASSHOLE networks when it comes to reporting facts. Both of them were fully reporting the Russia collusion hoax as fact. So this is clearly Twitter's contribution to Joe Biden's campaign.
We'll see how that gets reported to the FEC. If Twitter and Biden report it to the FEC will Twitter formally remove their position of impartial "platform"?
......Remind you of any other forums?
.
Last edited:
twitter is a private company that provides a communication platform
they are not compelled to allow content through the platform; based on
their existing terms of service, Trump should have been banned
instead they flagged the post. flagging an obviously false statement is
not "opposing" or "editorializing"
does reddit editorialize when it blurs NSFW images in the post list?
does T-Mobile editorialize when it flags a robocaller in the caller ID?
no, it's simply a feature of a product....and this moron is going to go and
shoot himself in the dick throwing a giant man-baby tantrum. it's fkn
embarrassing.
they are not compelled to allow content through the platform; based on
their existing terms of service, Trump should have been banned
instead they flagged the post. flagging an obviously false statement is
not "opposing" or "editorializing"
does reddit editorialize when it blurs NSFW images in the post list?
does T-Mobile editorialize when it flags a robocaller in the caller ID?
no, it's simply a feature of a product....and this moron is going to go and
shoot himself in the dick throwing a giant man-baby tantrum. it's fkn
embarrassing.
Bullshit. Twitter did not merely "flag" Trump's post. Twitter made an argument opposing Trump's viewpoint. That totally removes Twitter's status as a platform, and places them under FEC regulatory laws.
Is it okay to oppose Trump's viewpoint? Sure, but Twitter can't lie to its participants by claiming to simply be moderating.
.
If trump told you that you were a flaming homosexual would you believe him?